Recent comments

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    Never mind the amount of guns. $$$ The gun makers and NGA are addicted to money. $$$ Not even a freight train will stop them..

    Gun Insurance would put a damper on things. You don't have to register your stash of guns (for the paranoid) - Just have insurance if someone gets hurt. No insurance? Jail time! And allow people to carry guns at gun shows to show how safe they are. In fact, make it mandatory at gun shows.. Show the world how safe you feel around other gun owners! Let's put that on camera!

    Enact laws that would incrementally punish people more with larger clips if they get into a shooting incident. More bullets more time. No execeptions. No excuses.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    It would help if Eric Holder, Ollie North and all those in between didn't keep fast & furious gun drops going.

    Cartels from South of the Border, Bulgaria, and serveral other countries bring their big bad guns to their illegal pot grows in California. Home invasions happen regularly.

    Police at least an hour away from most invasions.

    #28

    They seem to forget to use muskets. I notice it's ok when you bring up FDR...yet if I put out info on T. Jefferson it's a problem for you. Different strokes for different folks?

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    @29 Dumb Shit
    Your statement "'I'm more of a reader than a watcher and, when not traveling, usually write in a room full of books, magazines, and various other reference materials, which are consulted regularly as well as the internet. I quit watching TV after Bush, Cheney, the fossil fuel industry, defense contractors, Wall Street Bankers, right-wing think tanks, and corporate media pundits used that platform to lie our nation into wars for oil and profit."

    If the above is true, that you quit watching TV, than explain this " I really don't care what you think or why, since you only seem to play on the surface and can only offer the same old right-wing crap that blares out nonstop over the airways, cable, and the internet swamp. Repetitive nonsense that means nothing and in the end is just boring as hell!

    Are you lieing in the first part or the second part

    You really are on an Ego trip, a delusional one I might add. Quit trying to Bully everyone, it's not working here.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    Rather than constructing eight paragraphs of response, why don't you just follow this sage advice, especially the last sentence.

    Mr. Ed sez, “You're not Mommy the Monitor. This is a free-speech zone, so post as much or as little as your black heart desires. If you can't handle my politically incorrect posts, then don't read them and don't respond.”

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    #22.

    Oh I see; now it's all about "creating a persona" for myself and not the subject matter. Strange. Why would you think that -- because that is what you are trying to do?

    In your mind evidently, revealed by your own words, posting on Thom's blog is all about shallow, high-school-level ego games and no substance, scoring drive-by hits on the stupid liberals in a vain effort to mollify the sneaking hunch that you might have wasted years of precious life totally hornswoggled by liars who call themselves "conservative" -- one of the most abused misnomers of all time.

    All ego and no substance. Other than Republican programmed talking points, it's all ya got. So naturally you can't handle detail. I just try to describe what's already there, right out in front of God and everyone to see. It has nothing to do with me personally, even though you continually try to make it so. Therefore, I just give you a taste of your own medicine, and try to have fun with it. That's all; pretty straight forward stuff, no? Why do you ascribe an ulterior motive?

    Of course the devil is in the details, especially when you're dealing with the empty rhetoric and lies of Republicans. Since you seem obsessed by my process of writing in fleshing out the pithy, half-baked thoughts of trolls -- where wingerisms fall apart -- I'll admit that drilling down past the baloney does take some effort. Obviously.

    I'm more of a reader than a watcher and, when not traveling, usually write in a room full of books, magazines, and various other reference materials, which are consulted regularly as well as the internet. I quit watching TV after Bush, Cheney, the fossil fuel industry, defense contractors, Wall Street Bankers, right-wing think tanks, and corporate media pundits used that platform to lie our nation into wars for oil and profit.

    As we all know, writing is a continuous struggle to say what one means so that there is no question about a taken position, right or wrong, good or bad. To be honest, failure is more common than success in this never-ending uphill battle. I wouldn't be a pimple on a real writer's ass, like Thom -- it takes way too much time and dedication, and I hate sitting on my ass for long periods of time -- it aint healthy.

    Sooo... what exactly is it about that process that "gives [me] away" in your little troll mind? More curious, why do you and the other trolls post here? You sure love to ascribe to others your own subjective interpretations and biases, with no credible outward evidence, but never explain yourself.

    Those questions are only rhetorical, granny; like I said, other than to tease you or for a spring board, I really don't care what you think or why, since you only seem to play on the surface and can only offer the same old right-wing crap that blares out nonstop over the airways, cable, and the internet swamp. Repetitive nonsense that means nothing and in the end is just boring as hell!

    Are the details of that position clear enough for you now?

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    K2 #24. Haha, Okay got it. Sorry, I was just baiting HotCoffee with a little light-hearted tongue and cheek humor. A little too subtle perhaps? Her point in her double posts was elaborated on quite sufficiently for both threads I would think, right? It was an interesting read, and with such long posts she is a gal after my heart.

    };--))

  • You Are Not Free If You Can't Afford Healthcare   7 years 13 weeks ago

    It appears someone missed their meds.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    Off topic but don't know where else to put this.

    I was researching the proposed budget and IRS revenue projection and ran across this info regarding unemployment benefits and who pays for it. I've often argued that this is NOT paid for by workers but by employers and some people actually thought it was the FICA tax which is for SS. Here it is straight from IRS website.
    "Federal Unemployment (FUTA) Tax
    Employers report and pay FUTA tax separately from Federal Income tax, and social security and Medicare taxes. You pay FUTA tax only from your own funds. Employees do not pay this tax or have it withheld from their pay. Refer to Publication 15, Employer's Tax Guide and Publication 15-A, Employer's Supplemental Tax Guide for more information on FUTA tax."

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    I completely agree that guns should be registered and I think the insurance requirement is a good thing. I don't agree that manufacturers should be able to sell to the general public weapons whose only possible use is killing human beings. I don't hunt but I can't imagine that you go after squirels or rabbits with an AR 15. I also think hunters and target shooters have time to reload so don't need 30 round clips. If we add to registration and banning assault weapons a data base that keeps information on felons and mentally unstable individuals, that would consitute effective, sensible gun control. You do have to accept that some people who might be perfectly willing to us guns responsibly will get caught up in the unstable or criminal labels but I think we just hve to accdpt that.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    Thom,

    I will not go through all your points with my counterpoints except for one, just for the sake of brevity. Registration.

    Consider a law that requires registration of firearms: a convicted felon can not be convicted for failing to register a gun, because it is illegal under Federal law for a felon to possess a firearm; but a person who can legally own a gun, and fails to register it, can be punished.

    The Fifth Amendment, Self-Incrimination, and Gun Registration https://www.firearmsandliberty.com/cramer.haynes.html

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    If you can't figure out what Hot Coffee is saying, maybe I can help.

    To summarize, the point the Founding Fathers were making is:

    Any Government who does not trust their citizens to own firearms, itself cannot be trusted.

    History is repleat with examples.

    K2

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    HotCoffee. What's your point? Nothing wrong with doing so, but you just posted a long list of the same exact cherry-picked quotes twice, yesterday and today, from a lot of different people who lived a long time ago in a completely different, pre-industrial, mostly hunting and agricultural era where guns were a completely different technological beast and which had a totally different significance to everyday survival than what the reality is today in the postmodern era with a professional, highly sophisticated and mechanized standing army, along with a permanent, well-equipped national guard to protect us.

    But I'm still not sure what you are ultimately trying to say. Sorry. Can you elaborate a little more?

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    And you stud muffin, clearly spent too much time on the DuckDuckGo machine trying to create a persona for yourself. Next time don't put in so much detail, it gives you away.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    Don't give a sh*t what you have to say anymore, granny; was more interested in what HotCoffee's take is. Your filter is too worn out and clogged up with decades and decades of right-wing spit and puss ...and, now, wistful visions of Big Daddy grabbing your pussy.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    Not rocket science here pony boy. HotCoffee is pointing out Thom is full of crap when he pumps out the Hartmann version of the second amendment.

    BTW, hell has frozen over,

    Thom Hartmann says he does not want to ban guns and Rick Steves endorses the Republicans health plan regarding medical savings accounts.

  • You Are Not Free If You Can't Afford Healthcare   7 years 13 weeks ago

    HotCoffee #33.

    "You know not of what you speak," and you have no idea what's in my heart, you arrogant pissant. Don't mistake natural -- and legitimate -- emotions of disgust and anger at right-wing injustice, fascistic mayhem, and big f*cking Republican lies, with "hate" of other human beings. That's the purview of Trump and his "Lock her up!" haters, such as yourself, you hypocritical piece of ordure. And nobody is talking about "free medical." What the hell is wrong with you?

    Also, piss poor job at deflecting there, Mensa-girl... Yup, f*ck Harvey Weinstein; but he's not the pretend president. And f*ck Bill Clinton; he's off the stage and relegated to the dustbin of history, as is Hillary, mostly. (Excuse me -- "Hellary.") Rest assured, although many of Bill's policy initiatives were progressive or at least quasi-progressive (Not all of course. Certainly, signing NAFTA was a major screw-up, but that was originally a Republican initiative through and through until recently when it became too politically unpopular.), I for one never did like the man at the personal level and attacked him mercilessly back in the day for his sexual transgressions and lies (adjudicated, impeached, and disbarred) as an embarrassment to our party.

    But other than a sparse sprinkling of conscious-stricken Republicans here and there, where is the hue and cry for accountability and the outrage on the right -- your outrage -- for the much worse transgressions of the Pussy Grabber (his own words, proudly uttered)? Trump trolls are defending a pervert who forced himself on, what, nearly two dozen women so far and counting, who judges them by their looks not their minds, who makes mean hurtful remarks on stage and on camera ("Look at that face! Fat disgusting pig! After 35, they're too old."), who said publicly that he would love to "date" his own daughter, who lusted after a ten-year-old kid unfortunate enough to attract his creepy gaze, who thought it was cool to burst in on half-naked teenage girls in their dressing room while they were rushing around trying to get ready for the Miss Teen USA pageant? Add pedophile to his resumé.

    Crickets...

    So excuuuse me for not copying and pasting entire encyclopedia passages about every sexual pervert who has ever lived, so that I can meet your high expectations for the other "1/2 [of] the story." Obviously I don't mind long posts, even from knuckle-dragging unibrow Trump trolls (usually in one's own words though), but trying to cover all the bases for the delight of your personal egocentric satisfaction, or to mechanically copy and paste ad nauseam, would be a ridiculous exercise, such as #34 above, wouldn't it? (Hello? In case you're wondering, we all know how to use the Google machine for further background and research.)

    And no, I am not "against [my] fellow counrty [sic] men and women" -- a deliberate mischaracterization of my words and meaning. Say, wasn't it you who once lectured everybody on how important it was to get our words just right? Okay then, I'm only "against" (very strongly) fascist pigs who wrap themselves in a flag and carry a cross, no matter what country they happen to crap in. It's not my fault that in this country, almost invariably, the looney-tunes and stark-raving-mad fascists happen to be Republicans. Is correlation cause?

    FYI: The standard definition of an ad hominem attack is to rebut an argument by only criticizing the person without addressing the subject matter. In debate, that is categorized as false argument. But one can address the topic and rebut the substance as well as insult the hell out of an "opponent." That would not be considered an ad hominem attack; it would be a rebuttal with an opinion attached, which would be legitimate. Do you see the difference?

    Now, don't get me wrong; being of Irish descendancy, I believe that insults are an art form whether they are given or received. Like a turd in granny's Christmas stocking, a good insult needs some polishin' and TLC. C'mon, who doesn't appreciate a proper scorching, eh? One can never master the art totally but only strive for perfection. I apologize, Madame HotCoffee, for constantly falling short of the quality insults you so well deserve.

    LOL, and you can post whatever the hell your little shriveled-up black heart so desires. (Hint, this isn't Twitter; one doesn't have "followers.") Insults don't bother "me" one bit, since I seldom attach ego to much of anything on social media, especially on an anonymous blog for chrissake! (WTF?) But it sure opens the door that swings both ways, now doesn't it? In fact, I relish the opportunity to return fire at right-wing false and fragile egos invested too much in their own bullsh*t. It's cheap entertainment for my "dark heart."

    I'm sorry that you have a myopic view of politics. You talk a good game about "both sides," but what we libtards detect in nearly all of your posts, are right-wing talking points that fairly consistently denigrate liberals, progressives, and/or Democrats. Evidently, your own personal interpretation of the Fux News "fair and balanced" lie is to be either on the right or on the extreme right -- IOW, Republican or Republican-lite.

    F***ck thaaat!!! Why not just be honest about what "side" you are really on? Yes, there are sides in politics. There has to be, and there should be. The "third way" is just another lie perpetrated by corporatists to con us all into blending with the background herds of bland, gray fascist followers -- sporting different hairdos but not much else, wandering around aimlessly with hollow eyes and shallow thoughts like "walkers" on The Walking Dead. How convenient.

    So, post #33 contains no substance, just ad hominem attacks and rather lame ones at that. Doesn't my "dark heart" deserve better and more biting insults than the thin soup you served up? It's so disappointing; please tell me ya got more than the equivalent of "you big poopy-head."

    I'll read #34 later (after my eyeballs quit bleeding) and offer my studied psychological diagnosis and assessment for your exclusive enjoyment and betterment. Oh wait; they're all someone else's words. Never mind.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    Totally agree-spoken like a small farmer who is educated in the classical mode and more.

    Many thinks--your writings and TV programs should become mainstream media for real progress in this country or all the "chicken little" warnings will come true.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    The mainstream media has completely forgotten about the deadliest church massacre in history, the one the US government carried out in Waco, Texas.

    On Sunday, a horrifying tragedy unfolded as a mass shooting terrorist walked into a Texas church and began slaughtering innocent women, men, and children. The massacre left 26 people dead, according to police, including an unborn child who died inside his pregnant mother.

    On Wednesday, the names of the deceased were released along with the heartbreaking photos of the children, two of which were only 5 and 7-years-old. The tragedy is being dubbed the deadliest mass shooting in Texas history.

    Sadly, there have been many deadly massacres which have taken place inside places of worship. From the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing to the Charleston Church shooting to Sutherland Springs, over the years, psychotic terrorists have gone into churches and indiscriminately taken innocent lives.

    Now, some of those in the mainstream media are calling Sutherland Springs the deadly massacre in a church in US history. However, the actual largest church massacre in history had a far greater death toll.

    The US government carried out the deadliest church massacre in history and it led to the deaths of 82 men, women, and children. It all came to a violent end 24 years ago in Texas

    Our source material comes from the FBI’s own vault, which contains two files on the case against Vernon Howell, also known as David Koresh. Koresh was the leader of the “Branch Davidians Seventh Day Adventists.” According to the FBI case file, Koresh was believed to have been holding people against their will at his compound in Waco, Texas, potentially guilty of “involuntary servitude and slavery” charges.

    In 1992, Child Protective Services (CPS) was called in to investigate the accusations. After a thorough investigation, CPS concluded no one was being held at the compound against their will, nor any child abuse, and the federal prosecutor, who reviewed the report, saw no reason to prosecute Koresh. On October 16th, 1992, the FBI closed the case against Koresh and the allegations he was abusing children and holding his followers against their will.

    we all know how it ended.

    bought to you by Bill Clinton & Janet Reno

    .

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    The US is a violent country with a violent culture -- whether they use guns, knives, fists, bottles, or bombs. Add in the extraordinary economic stresses of this era, where millions are on a rightrope with no safety net below. Millions or ordinary people know that they need protection from their fellow Americans. Not happy talk, but this is the way it is.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    "A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined..."
    - George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790

    "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
    - Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

    "I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787

    "What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

    "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
    - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776

    "A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785

    "The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824

    "On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 12 June 1823

    "I enclose you a list of the killed, wounded, and captives of the enemy from the commencement of hostilities at Lexington in April, 1775, until November, 1777, since which there has been no event of any consequence ... I think that upon the whole it has been about one half the number lost by them, in some instances more, but in others less. This difference is ascribed to our superiority in taking aim when we fire; every soldier in our army having been intimate with his gun from his infancy."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to Giovanni Fabbroni, June 8, 1778

    “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

    "To disarm the people...[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them."
    - George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adooption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788

    "I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
    - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788

    "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops."
    - Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787

    "Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of."
    - James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788

    "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country."
    - James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789

    "...the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone..."
    - James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788

    "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
    - William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

    “A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
    - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

    "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
    - Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778

    "This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty.... The right of self defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction."
    - St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1803

    "The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms, like law, discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The balance ofpower is the scale of peace. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. And while a single nation refuses to lay them down, it is proper that all should keep them up. Horrid mischief would ensue were one-half the world deprived of the use of them; for while avarice and ambition have a place in the heart of man, the weak will become a prey to the strong. The history of every age and nation establishes these truths, and facts need but little arguments when they prove themselves."
    - Thomas Paine, "Thoughts on Defensive War" in Pennsylvania Magazine, July 1775

    "The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
    - Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788

    "The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
    - Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 1833

    "What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty .... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins."
    - Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, I Annals of Congress 750, August 17, 1789

    "For it is a truth, which the experience of ages has attested, that the people are always most in danger when the means of injuring their rights are in the possession of those of whom they entertain the least suspicion."
    - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 25, December 21, 1787

    "If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."
    - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

    "[I]f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."
    - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28, January 10, 1788

    "As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms."
    - Tench Coxe, Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    The US is a dangerous, violent nation -- not only in the urban areas. Many of the elderly, the disabled, etc., rely on guns for protection. That's just a reality of life in this country.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    Points well taken, deepspace. In a perfect world, there would be no deadly weapons out there. I'm afraid we turned that corner a while ago, however.

  • Would You Ban All Guns If You Could?   7 years 13 weeks ago

    js121. Thanks for a great perspective from someone who actually lives in a country that sees the light.

    Nomastrump. Cool metaphor! LOL, I was wondering why "wingers" have been flying around in circles all these years. Let the record show that Democrats, much to the chagrin of many in their base, have bent over backwards trying to find common ground with Republican reprobates on important issues that actually matter to most citizens.

    All to no avail (unless Republicans paint themselves into a corner and need Democrats to bail them out). Their big idea of compromise is usually for "Dumbocrats" just to sit down and shut up ...and for God's sake, whatever else you may say or do, please, please, please do not vote! Oh, the horror!

    Outback. Touché. Again, a well-defended argument.

    Although it's undeniable that mass murderers are very inventive at dreaming up different ways to commit atrocities, especially the bombers (It's a good thing plastic explosives are heavily restricted.), why do so many shooters nowadays prefer the AR's with banana clips and/or auto-pistols with foot-long clips? Is it because they are readily available, convenient, and can kill many people in a short time at a great distance, unlike a scattergun?

    Sawed-off shotguns (later banned by The Geneva Conventions) were very deadly at close range in WWI trenches. And they could be very deadly in, say, a school, church, or theater. But they are still not as deadly as rockin' and rollin' with a modified military-grade AR and fast-change clips. Maybe we can't totally ban mass-murder machines in the U.S. because of our entrenched gun culture, but surely, they need to be much more regulated.

    Personally, I still think America has way too many military assault weapons sloshing around on the streets where we are trying to live and raise children. And they are called "military assault weapons" because that is exactly what they are. You wouldn't call an artillery piece a slingshot.

    I used to enjoy shooting my AR-15 (sold it at a loss to get rid of it), as I did the M-16 while in the military, until Columbine (Hi-Point 995 9mm carbine, sawed-off shotguns, and homemade explosives), the Aurora, Colorado theater shooting (tear gas grenades, M&P15 Sport rifle, Remington 870 Express Tactical shotgun, Glock 22 handgun), Sandy Hook (Bushmaster XM15-E2S rifle), and on and on, got stuck in my noodle.

    You're right; it is emotional -- a great sadness. I trained extensively for it but never had the opportunity to fight in a live shooting war. (Thank God!) When I got out of the Army, I didn't expect to come home to a live domestic war zone.

    "Since then [Sandy Hook], there have been at least 1,552 mass shootings, with at least 1,767 people killed and 6,227 wounded." -- Gun Violence Archive.

    Good debate, Outback. Thanks.

    https://www.vox.com/a/mass-shootings-sandy-hook

    http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/

    https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/06/12/481768384/a-list-of-the-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history

  • You Are Not Free If You Can't Afford Healthcare   7 years 13 weeks ago

    "A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined..."
    - George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790

    "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
    - Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

    "I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787

    "What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

    "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
    - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776

    "A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785

    "The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824

    "On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 12 June 1823

    "I enclose you a list of the killed, wounded, and captives of the enemy from the commencement of hostilities at Lexington in April, 1775, until November, 1777, since which there has been no event of any consequence ... I think that upon the whole it has been about one half the number lost by them, in some instances more, but in others less. This difference is ascribed to our superiority in taking aim when we fire; every soldier in our army having been intimate with his gun from his infancy."
    - Thomas Jefferson, letter to Giovanni Fabbroni, June 8, 1778

    “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

    "To disarm the people...[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them."
    - George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adooption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788

    "I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
    - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788

    "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops."
    - Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787

    "Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of."
    - James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788

    "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country."
    - James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789

    "...the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone..."
    - James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788

    "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
    - William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

    “A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
    - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

    "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
    - Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778

    "This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty.... The right of self defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction."
    - St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1803

    "The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms, like law, discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The balance ofpower is the scale of peace. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. And while a single nation refuses to lay them down, it is proper that all should keep them up. Horrid mischief would ensue were one-half the world deprived of the use of them; for while avarice and ambition have a place in the heart of man, the weak will become a prey to the strong. The history of every age and nation establishes these truths, and facts need but little arguments when they prove themselves."
    - Thomas Paine, "Thoughts on Defensive War" in Pennsylvania Magazine, July 1775

    "The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
    - Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788

    "The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
    - Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 1833

    "What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty .... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins."
    - Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, I Annals of Congress 750, August 17, 1789

    "For it is a truth, which the experience of ages has attested, that the people are always most in danger when the means of injuring their rights are in the possession of those of whom they entertain the least suspicion."
    - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 25, December 21, 1787

    "If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."
    - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

    "[I]f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."
    - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28, January 10, 1788

    "As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms."
    - Tench Coxe, Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789

  • You Are Not Free If You Can't Afford Healthcare   7 years 13 weeks ago

    #21

    If your heart is as dark as your words I can see why free medical is so important to you.

    Hate is a good source of medical problems.

    Or is it just ego, getting that pat on the back from your followers?

    AND funny how you keep on with the DT Pussy thing from 30, 40 years ago... but ignore the Harvey Hollywierd liberal cess pool that endorsed HC and MR. I didn't have sex with that woman which is is ongoing.

    Omitting 1/2 the story might suit your purposes but isn't the truth.

    Odd that you seem so concerned for the world yet so against your fellow counrty men and women.

ADHD: Hunter in a Farmer's World

Thom Hartmann has written a dozen books covering ADD / ADHD - Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder.

Join Thom for his new twice-weekly email newsletters on ADHD, whether it affects you or a member of your family.

Thom's Blog Is On the Move

Hello All

Thom's blog in this space and moving to a new home.

Please follow us across to hartmannreport.com - this will be the only place going forward to read Thom's blog posts and articles.