Ayn Rand would be so proud of the"conservative" mantra that surrounds the wearing of masks today. The "screw everyone else" attitude that has infected so much of the public today is totally consistant with her lifelong belief that society is non-existant, and only belief in the wants of self are important, dispite the fact she died on medi-care and social security.
deepspace: Maybe i am too late for continouing the argument from point #15 (up to now) but ....
Thanks for bothering with a long answer and the link to Milton Meyers' excerpt.
I believe in an objective reality, and i think (i could be wrong of course) we mean pretty much the same thing with "objective reality"). Furthermore i concede that my interpretation of this objective reality is subjective, most likely different (to some extent at least) from yours, or anybody else's interpretation, and in this sense i accept your well-meant criticism that my writing supports the case of relativism of interpretations of the same objective reality.
Although a journalist who did not finish his studies, may be saying the truth and may have excellent ideas, I would like the experts' (a couple of historians for example,with "opposing" point of views") analyses on the "They thought they were free". The fact that Milton Meyer may be jewish does not make his version more objective. The fact that he is American, may insinuate that what he wrote about Germans maybe (at least in part) fictional, because he may be trying to describe USA in an artistically psychological and theatrical way (quite effectve as didactic method). To the extent that this is true, the objective truth of what the Germans (as a people) learned or did not learn from WWII remains in the realm of our (relative) opinions, and possibly (but not necessarily) not close to the realm of objective Truth.
I am not familiar with the civil war. Where i grew up, it was considered as an antagonism between the industrial north and the agricultural south (or part of it). Abolition of slavery was more of an excuse rather than the cause. In this reading, it was a clash for the future direction of USA: move forward (and rapidly) towards the technological revolution (with all the mixed bag it brings) or delay (i do not think it is avoidable) it by having some states follow the traditional way of things. To the extent that this interpretation is true, some monuments may not symbolize only slavery, but other things as well.
As a negative counter example. Does the lack of confederate monuments imply respect for black lives, for blacks in general? Presumably in Detroit and most of MI there are no such monuments. Yet the Algiers Motel incident back in 1967 has yet to be resolved in a respectable way. Furtermore, i would bet that rates of discrimination against blacks show little, if any correlation, with the absence or presence (defaced or not) confederate monuments.
The challenge of implementing a fair "wealth" tax is how one defines wealth. Some wealth is earned by producing goods and providing services. Even more wealth is derived from legal privileges that create rent-seeking opportunities. The most appropriate source of public revenue was identified by the political economists going back to Richard Cantillon, Adam Smith and Anne Robert Turgot; namely, the rent of land. The economics are fairly straightforward. Every parcel or tract of land has some potential annual rental value based on advantages provided by nature (e.g., sub-surface minerals to be exploited, fertility, forests to be harvested, access to a natural harbor or navigible river, etc), or societally-created advantages (e.g., quality of infrastructure and other public amenities). These rental values are not individually-created. Justice requires that they be collected to pay for democratically agreed upon public goods and services (with the possibility of a distribution annually as a form of citizens dividend). There are other rents created by competition-limited licenses (e.g, liquor licenses and taxi medallions) and for assets with an inelastic supply (e.g., take-off and landing slots at airports). All of these and other sources of rents should be colllected as the basis for public finance.
What about taxing income? Most people earn income as wages by working. Those who have managed to accumulate or inherit large amounts of financial assets derive income from passive investment and speculation. In one of the great logical inconsistencies we tax earned wages higher than gains on the sale of financial assets. We call such gains "capital gains" and accept the idea that a low rate of taxation stimulates investment in the real economy. In reality actual capital goods (i.e., buildings, machinery, technologies) depreciate in value over time (even when well-maintained). Thus, gains on the sale of assets should be included with all other income and taxed progressively so that most tax revenue comes from income derived from rent-seeking, passive investment and speculation. So, here's what we need as an income tax: (1) Exempt all individual income up to the national median; (2) Eliminate all other deductions and exemptions: (3) Impose an increasing rate of taxation on higher ranges of income sufficient to raise enough revenue to balance the public budget.
Scrap the business profits tax in favor of a graduated tax on gross business revenue, exempting, for example, all business revenue up to some amount, eliminating all other deductions, and imposing an increasing rate of taxation on higher ranges of revenue. The one possible deducation would be a tax credit for every person employed full time and covered for medical insurance and a defined benefit pension.
There are more ideas to consider, but these are what I believe are the most important to achieve a far more just distribution of income and wealth.
Trump, the failed businessman and tax cheat who avoided paying taxes for eight years in the 80s and 90s, thinks that it's a winning talking point for Republicans when Democrats talk about raising taxes on the rich. As wrong as he is on virtually every issue, he does know his audience well -- Republicans always spin it falsely to mean that Democrats want to raise taxes on the middle class. He even lied like hell in a church (of course he did) in a recent speech to the enraptured faithful, his useful idiots:
"One of the things is the Democrats want to raise your taxes to a level that nobody can even believe. And it won’t be nearly enough to pay for what they want to do. You talk about bad healthcare; it’s just going to be a disaster. But they want to raise everybody’s taxes. I always thought it was supposed to be the other way, right? But let’s see how they do on November 3rd. I don’t think they’re going to do too well."
However, that standard billionaire lie only works with the Republican Party's mesmerized base, as the American people by vast majorities are much wiser than those who can be fooled all of the time:
Well, though I agree a wealth tax is needed - in fact, there should be an earnings cap, but that's another story - property taxes are not an apt analog. Property tax is a means of charging for shared services people are entitled to, regardless of whether they use them. The value of the property taxed is a convenient, if imprecise, measure of the value of services they receive. Where I live, we pay property tax to four distinct jurisdictions: Village, Town, County and School District. The first three are divvied up among things like water, sewer, garbage, police, fire, etc.
Thanks to the duplicitous Republican Party, the principal subsidiary of Wall Street (and their right-of-center, corporate Dem enablers), America's healthcare system is utterly broken; America's threadbare safety net for low-paid workers and the homeless is one of the worst in the industrialized world; decades of union-busting have left most American families struggling for the basics, leaving virtually no effective retirement plan for their overburdened breadwinners, who must toil away until they drop dead without ever escaping crushing debt; America's wealth is monopolized by the selfish, ruthless, and greedy few; trillions of American dollars have been lavished on a paranoid and delusional military empire whose jingoistic creed of endless expansion and war have spread across a world that hates us, rivaling the worst fascistic powers in history; all within six months, America's head clown has been impeached, a highly infectious and deadly pandemic is running wild with no end in sight, the real economy is collapsing into a depression of biblical proportions, social unrest has exploded under systemic racism and police brutality, which are still rampant 150 years after the war to end slavery; and with no rational strategy for mitigation, America is leading a planet hurtling toward the sixth mass extinction.
And yet after all of that (If you need references for the painfully obvious then either you are not paying attention or just don't care.), America remains hopelessly infested with fcking idiots whose howling-at-the-moon notion of patriotism and religion compels them to vote Republican even when outside reality is slapping up against their impenetrable, braindead skulls.
Seems like there is not a lot of info on what this virus is costing in hospital bills. The insurance companies are probably paying out large sums. I have read about single patients with million dollar bills. If you owe 20% that is $200000. A lot of people could never pay that. Then there is the uninsured. Who pays that? Where is the information on bankruptcies? Hospital finances? How is Medicare dealing with this? Medicaid? Medicare Advantage plans? Could Thom get an expert on his show?
Plus the breaking of unions to the point that blue collar workers knock them. Saw plenty of this in my industrial consulting career. The Ludlow Massacre was about 80 miles from my home. Tried to get workers to read up on it if you needed a reason for Unions.
Ever since America has been at the mercy of an establishment whose members aren't elected or subject to checks and balances. This, argues Burns, contradicts fundamentals of yank democracy-that the people decide. More than just a philosophical crisis, this paradigm has historically produced I'm working Cheap Essay Writing Service . The court viciously upheld pro-slavery laws until the war with rulings like Scott, and it continued to combat civil rights initiatives during the Reconstruction with decisions like Cruikshank.
"Mayors all over the country are admitting that the recent protest marches have been a huge contributing factor helping to spread this virus." -- whatabout
It's my theory that the bulk of the racism experenced today, stems from working class whites who's jobs were shipped overseas to satisfy the greed of our elites. Through certain media outlets they were told that the falt lay with brown and black people taking their jobs. Bingo, creeping racism..
Gotta' keep the workers at each others throats don't ya' know?
I still can't believe there's not one story in the MSM about our global bio-weapons research. Also, besides our pandemic, the fact that all stories of the ongoing class war being waged against the working classes is totally absent on MSM.
With the MSM the only two subjects discussed are race and virus, both used to divide the working classes. The classic "divide and conquer" techniques the elites have used forever to misdirect the working masses.
Not that racism isn't a problem in the U$A, but more $ directed toward the bottom of the economic pyramid would certainly help mitigate the obvious problem.
Legislation hasen't solved the problem, maybe better wages for the bottom third of the workforce, and medicare for all could.
But, our "leadership" refuses to even mention it...
Thom, you sometimes confuse the word profit with the word survival. A functioning economy is necessary for the survival of us all.
Wear your mask for personal protection and as a signal to others that you are being a responsible person.
Do not march in protests. Mayors all over the country are admitting that the recent protest marches have been a huge contributing factor helping to spread this virus.
Don't follow the path of those in countries like Taiwan where many feel masks are not needed.
You are working with an individual in a work placement at a grocery store and taking data on his target behaviors. What do you need to consider regarding data collection to maintain the individual's right to confidentiality? a. Do not use the individuals name when documenting notes or data b. Keep all data sheets and documentation on you at all times and avoid leaving them ion a public area https://quizzma.com/rbt-practice-exam/ c. Remove all identifying information from the data sheets, including name, diagnosis, of the name title discloses diagnostic information d. All of the above
Jammin’ Jars is a fun and fruity slot from Push Gaming, and it was first released 14 September 2018. You’ll find a huge layout of 8x8 reels, and they are jam packed with colorful fruit and berry symbols that will make your mouth water like some Pavlovian dog. It’s like a fruity version of Tetris, and every time you form a winning cluster, the symbols collapse and give room for new symbols falling down from above. You’ll also find plenty of special features on this game, including a free spins feature with multiplier wilds. It might not look like it, but this game is highly volatile and has a max win of 20 000 times your stake https://slotmode.guide/slots/jammin-jars-pushgaming/
Ayn Rand would be so proud of the"conservative" mantra that surrounds the wearing of masks today. The "screw everyone else" attitude that has infected so much of the public today is totally consistant with her lifelong belief that society is non-existant, and only belief in the wants of self are important, dispite the fact she died on medi-care and social security.
So much for "rugged individualism".
Excellent! Please advise the incoming Biden administration.
deepspace: Maybe i am too late for continouing the argument from point #15 (up to now) but ....
Thanks for bothering with a long answer and the link to Milton Meyers' excerpt.
I believe in an objective reality, and i think (i could be wrong of course) we mean pretty much the same thing with "objective reality"). Furthermore i concede that my interpretation of this objective reality is subjective, most likely different (to some extent at least) from yours, or anybody else's interpretation, and in this sense i accept your well-meant criticism that my writing supports the case of relativism of interpretations of the same objective reality.
Although a journalist who did not finish his studies, may be saying the truth and may have excellent ideas, I would like the experts' (a couple of historians for example,with "opposing" point of views") analyses on the "They thought they were free". The fact that Milton Meyer may be jewish does not make his version more objective. The fact that he is American, may insinuate that what he wrote about Germans maybe (at least in part) fictional, because he may be trying to describe USA in an artistically psychological and theatrical way (quite effectve as didactic method). To the extent that this is true, the objective truth of what the Germans (as a people) learned or did not learn from WWII remains in the realm of our (relative) opinions, and possibly (but not necessarily) not close to the realm of objective Truth.
I am not familiar with the civil war. Where i grew up, it was considered as an antagonism between the industrial north and the agricultural south (or part of it). Abolition of slavery was more of an excuse rather than the cause. In this reading, it was a clash for the future direction of USA: move forward (and rapidly) towards the technological revolution (with all the mixed bag it brings) or delay (i do not think it is avoidable) it by having some states follow the traditional way of things. To the extent that this interpretation is true, some monuments may not symbolize only slavery, but other things as well.
As a negative counter example. Does the lack of confederate monuments imply respect for black lives, for blacks in general? Presumably in Detroit and most of MI there are no such monuments. Yet the Algiers Motel incident back in 1967 has yet to be resolved in a respectable way. Furtermore, i would bet that rates of discrimination against blacks show little, if any correlation, with the absence or presence (defaced or not) confederate monuments.
The challenge of implementing a fair "wealth" tax is how one defines wealth. Some wealth is earned by producing goods and providing services. Even more wealth is derived from legal privileges that create rent-seeking opportunities. The most appropriate source of public revenue was identified by the political economists going back to Richard Cantillon, Adam Smith and Anne Robert Turgot; namely, the rent of land. The economics are fairly straightforward. Every parcel or tract of land has some potential annual rental value based on advantages provided by nature (e.g., sub-surface minerals to be exploited, fertility, forests to be harvested, access to a natural harbor or navigible river, etc), or societally-created advantages (e.g., quality of infrastructure and other public amenities). These rental values are not individually-created. Justice requires that they be collected to pay for democratically agreed upon public goods and services (with the possibility of a distribution annually as a form of citizens dividend). There are other rents created by competition-limited licenses (e.g, liquor licenses and taxi medallions) and for assets with an inelastic supply (e.g., take-off and landing slots at airports). All of these and other sources of rents should be colllected as the basis for public finance.
What about taxing income? Most people earn income as wages by working. Those who have managed to accumulate or inherit large amounts of financial assets derive income from passive investment and speculation. In one of the great logical inconsistencies we tax earned wages higher than gains on the sale of financial assets. We call such gains "capital gains" and accept the idea that a low rate of taxation stimulates investment in the real economy. In reality actual capital goods (i.e., buildings, machinery, technologies) depreciate in value over time (even when well-maintained). Thus, gains on the sale of assets should be included with all other income and taxed progressively so that most tax revenue comes from income derived from rent-seeking, passive investment and speculation. So, here's what we need as an income tax: (1) Exempt all individual income up to the national median; (2) Eliminate all other deductions and exemptions: (3) Impose an increasing rate of taxation on higher ranges of income sufficient to raise enough revenue to balance the public budget.
Scrap the business profits tax in favor of a graduated tax on gross business revenue, exempting, for example, all business revenue up to some amount, eliminating all other deductions, and imposing an increasing rate of taxation on higher ranges of revenue. The one possible deducation would be a tax credit for every person employed full time and covered for medical insurance and a defined benefit pension.
There are more ideas to consider, but these are what I believe are the most important to achieve a far more just distribution of income and wealth.
Wealth has been taxed in the past without weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth
Where are they going to go? China?
Do it again now!
"We have nothing to fear but fear itself" (Roosevelt)
You have stated things quite well. Keep posting!
};--))
Trump, the failed businessman and tax cheat who avoided paying taxes for eight years in the 80s and 90s, thinks that it's a winning talking point for Republicans when Democrats talk about raising taxes on the rich. As wrong as he is on virtually every issue, he does know his audience well -- Republicans always spin it falsely to mean that Democrats want to raise taxes on the middle class. He even lied like hell in a church (of course he did) in a recent speech to the enraptured faithful, his useful idiots:
"One of the things is the Democrats want to raise your taxes to a level that nobody can even believe. And it won’t be nearly enough to pay for what they want to do. You talk about bad healthcare; it’s just going to be a disaster. But they want to raise everybody’s taxes. I always thought it was supposed to be the other way, right? But let’s see how they do on November 3rd. I don’t think they’re going to do too well."
However, that standard billionaire lie only works with the Republican Party's mesmerized base, as the American people by vast majorities are much wiser than those who can be fooled all of the time:
Most Americans Want the Rich to Pay Higher Taxes, According to Every Poll Everywhere
Taxing the rich is extremely popular
Study: Majority of Americans Support Wealth Tax on Very Rich
Most millionaires support a tax on wealth above $50 million, CNBC survey says
Americans' Long-Standing Interest in Taxing the Rich
Americans want the wealthy and corporations to pay more taxes, but are elected officials listening?
Well, though I agree a wealth tax is needed - in fact, there should be an earnings cap, but that's another story - property taxes are not an apt analog. Property tax is a means of charging for shared services people are entitled to, regardless of whether they use them. The value of the property taxed is a convenient, if imprecise, measure of the value of services they receive. Where I live, we pay property tax to four distinct jurisdictions: Village, Town, County and School District. The first three are divvied up among things like water, sewer, garbage, police, fire, etc.
@ # 8; Great synopsis, better stated than I ever could. Thanks..
Thanks to the duplicitous Republican Party, the principal subsidiary of Wall Street (and their right-of-center, corporate Dem enablers), America's healthcare system is utterly broken; America's threadbare safety net for low-paid workers and the homeless is one of the worst in the industrialized world; decades of union-busting have left most American families struggling for the basics, leaving virtually no effective retirement plan for their overburdened breadwinners, who must toil away until they drop dead without ever escaping crushing debt; America's wealth is monopolized by the selfish, ruthless, and greedy few; trillions of American dollars have been lavished on a paranoid and delusional military empire whose jingoistic creed of endless expansion and war have spread across a world that hates us, rivaling the worst fascistic powers in history; all within six months, America's head clown has been impeached, a highly infectious and deadly pandemic is running wild with no end in sight, the real economy is collapsing into a depression of biblical proportions, social unrest has exploded under systemic racism and police brutality, which are still rampant 150 years after the war to end slavery; and with no rational strategy for mitigation, America is leading a planet hurtling toward the sixth mass extinction.
And yet after all of that (If you need references for the painfully obvious then either you are not paying attention or just don't care.), America remains hopelessly infested with fcking idiots whose howling-at-the-moon notion of patriotism and religion compels them to vote Republican even when outside reality is slapping up against their impenetrable, braindead skulls.
I completely agree with you, that is a big part of the problem.
Seems like there is not a lot of info on what this virus is costing in hospital bills. The insurance companies are probably paying out large sums. I have read about single patients with million dollar bills. If you owe 20% that is $200000. A lot of people could never pay that. Then there is the uninsured. Who pays that? Where is the information on bankruptcies? Hospital finances? How is Medicare dealing with this? Medicaid? Medicare Advantage plans? Could Thom get an expert on his show?
Plus the breaking of unions to the point that blue collar workers knock them. Saw plenty of this in my industrial consulting career. The Ludlow Massacre was about 80 miles from my home. Tried to get workers to read up on it if you needed a reason for Unions.
Okay. Kinda kind.
Ever since America has been at the mercy of an establishment whose members aren't elected or subject to checks and balances. This, argues Burns, contradicts fundamentals of yank democracy-that the people decide. More than just a philosophical crisis, this paradigm has historically produced I'm working Cheap Essay Writing Service . The court viciously upheld pro-slavery laws until the war with rulings like Scott, and it continued to combat civil rights initiatives during the Reconstruction with decisions like Cruikshank.
Exactly. Conquer and divide to distract from the real story -- the main chapter in the billionaire playbook.
"Wear your mask for personal protection and as a signal to others that you are being a responsible person." -- whatabout
Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus
Airborne Coronavirus: What You Should Do Now
239 Experts With One Big Claim: The Coronavirus Is Airborne
Face masks critical in preventing spread of COVID-19
Masks help stop the spread of coronavirus
How Masks Went From Don’t-Wear to Must-Have
"Mayors all over the country are admitting that the recent protest marches have been a huge contributing factor helping to spread this virus." -- whatabout
Black Lives Matter protests have not led to a spike in coronavirus cases, research says
Protests probably didn’t lead to coronavirus spikes, but it’s hard to know for sure
Research Determines Protests Did Not Cause Spike In Coronavirus Cases
BLM protests have not led to a spike in coronavirus cases: study
Nationwide Protests Haven't Caused a COVID-19 Spike (So Far.) Here's What We Can Learn From That
Protests have not contributed to rise in COVID-19 cases, research group suggests
Did protests lead to spike in coronavirus cases?
Researchers say it's unlikely
Did Floyd Protests Lead to a Virus Surge? Here’s What We Know. Epidemiologists have braced for a surge of coronavirus cases. But it has not come yet.
"Don't follow the path of those in countries like Taiwan where many feel masks are not needed." -- whatabout
To expand a bit on my #1
It's my theory that the bulk of the racism experenced today, stems from working class whites who's jobs were shipped overseas to satisfy the greed of our elites. Through certain media outlets they were told that the falt lay with brown and black people taking their jobs. Bingo, creeping racism..
Gotta' keep the workers at each others throats don't ya' know?
I still can't believe there's not one story in the MSM about our global bio-weapons research. Also, besides our pandemic, the fact that all stories of the ongoing class war being waged against the working classes is totally absent on MSM.
With the MSM the only two subjects discussed are race and virus, both used to divide the working classes. The classic "divide and conquer" techniques the elites have used forever to misdirect the working masses.
Not that racism isn't a problem in the U$A, but more $ directed toward the bottom of the economic pyramid would certainly help mitigate the obvious problem.
Legislation hasen't solved the problem, maybe better wages for the bottom third of the workforce, and medicare for all could.
But, our "leadership" refuses to even mention it...
Deepspace, please be kinder. No personal attacks.
india pharmacy viagra http://silaxera.com/# - india pharmacy viagra generic viagra coupon viagra professional viagra 100 mg best price generic viagra best price
india pharmacy viagra http://silaxera.com/# - india pharmacy viagra generic viagra coupon viagra professional viagra 100 mg best price generic viagra best price
Thom, you sometimes confuse the word profit with the word survival. A functioning economy is necessary for the survival of us all.
Wear your mask for personal protection and as a signal to others that you are being a responsible person.
Do not march in protests. Mayors all over the country are admitting that the recent protest marches have been a huge contributing factor helping to spread this virus.
Don't follow the path of those in countries like Taiwan where many feel masks are not needed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4KK7Ka8ex0
You are working with an individual in a work placement at a grocery store and taking data on his target behaviors. What do you need to consider regarding data collection to maintain the individual's right to confidentiality?
a. Do not use the individuals name when documenting notes or data
b. Keep all data sheets and documentation on you at all times and avoid leaving them ion a public area https://quizzma.com/rbt-practice-exam/
c. Remove all identifying information from the data sheets, including name, diagnosis, of the name title discloses diagnostic information
d. All of the above
Jammin’ Jars is a fun and fruity slot from Push Gaming, and it was first released 14 September 2018. You’ll find a huge layout of 8x8 reels, and they are jam packed with colorful fruit and berry symbols that will make your mouth water like some Pavlovian dog. It’s like a fruity version of Tetris, and every time you form a winning cluster, the symbols collapse and give room for new symbols falling down from above. You’ll also find plenty of special features on this game, including a free spins feature with multiplier wilds. It might not look like it, but this game is highly volatile and has a max win of 20 000 times your stake https://slotmode.guide/slots/jammin-jars-pushgaming/