I was under the impression that this 2016 election was the first really unconstitutional election filled with everything the Corrupt Corporation Republicans could muster! Looks like I was completely in the dark on how bad they could get. I see the next election getting worse.
And it only took 40 years for about half of the people to wake up and see they are thieves. They worship, and do the evil of the rich. They suppress voters. The Democrats aren't angles either, they suck up to the corporations too - to a lesser extent (to wich they will owe them favors). But they still kind of care about the voters. So you vote for the lesser evil. (The green party will not win because it still has no strength.) Can't wait for the next 40 years for the rest of the people to wake up and see they've been ripped off. Oh, wait, I'll be already dead.
"Then that goddamn FAKE media had to splash pictures everywhere of that black sonofabitch, has-been president thanking his supporters for defeating Republicans and Trumpcare. FU! I'm the president now! And my crowd size is bigger! More than 140 characters? FU2! And all those little boy scout bastards! Reince Priebus, Sen. Grassley, and Gen. Dunford Jr. too! Ef em all! Poor sick people, my ass! Democrats and Hillary voters! Banning fags should put me at the center of attention again." @tRump
Diane, I am sure that Donald stays awake a night worrying about your 401K. "You're so vain." Actually, it's a surprise that anyone in the Whitie House gets any sleep with the stench that is everpresent in the oval office these days.
I am sure he will have a fan club after he is shown the door, after all even Charles Manson has one. Maybe you could put your best Republican smile on and try out for chapter head dragon of your local Trump oval bat cave. Mind your step, there will be a lot of guano in there as well.
I have no problem with property rights of which, capitalism is one expression. What is obscene, it seems to me, is that by incremental democratic process over the past 40 some years "We the People" have for one, allowed a few to gain absolute control over the communications megaphone. Now in control of the medium these few, shaping the message and collective thought to their super minority ends.
Responding to their anti-regulatory, anti-tax message, the message of the #billionaireclass expressed through their republican minions "We" have permitted restraint against irresponsible corporate behavior as well as the tax obligation of real and for the moment corporate persons to be reduced to almost negligible or one might even say negligent propotions.
The upshot being that while we live seemingly free, free to dress as we please, to associate with whom we please, to speak our minds, to travel; when viewed through an economic frame I ask, who is free that must labor sun up to sun down for compensation that bears no reflection to fair share of the wealth of our individual and collective labors, the volume of wealth we have produced? The answer is no one.
When viewed through this economic frame I ask further, how is our present reality any different from that of the worker of 250 years ago, the pre-revolutionary worker? It isn't; only the labels have changed. The masses labor to the benefit of a few.
For the first 150 years or so following the American Revolution, little changed. Then came the final insult, the crash of 29. Finally, Americans expressed the truly revolutionary promise of our revolution that in throwing off the shackles of monarchy "We the People" unlike the past wherein the only response to tyranny was violence, "We", the masses were now able to assure each could access or build a path to accessing fair share of the wealth of our labor; the vehicle, democratic process. By democratic process, we could insure that the apex alpha class of our society paid tax in proportion to their wealth, income and profits.
That my friends is the truly revolutionary outcome of our revolution, the masses for the first time in history could tax the property owner, thereby maintain the greatest portion of wealth in circulation and accessible. This reality is obscured in the question polled here and is moot when and if the the "People" exercise their democratic authority "...to promote the general Welfare".
#Taxthebillionaireclass
The democrats just missed their opportunity. The US Senate voted on a "single payer:" amendment Thursday night. Not one democrat voted for the amendment. That's right, NOT ONE. Could someone please explain.
Thanks to you malcontent leftie socialists, since the election of president Trump, my stock in P&G the makers of Pepto-bismol is up about 9%.
Now I need to research the charts of public conpanies that make dental implants because I am sure as this continues most of you will have no teeth left to chew your kale and sunflower dinner salads.
Thank you once again for making my morning a bit brighter and fatten my 401k at the same time.
Interesting. I though that the cost of the medical treatments to control hormones and to get plastic surgery needed to change sex would have been higher than you mention here. What's more, it's surprising that the military spends so much in Viagra.
There's an additional cost that you don't mention. There is the cost of separation in the barracks. Right now they have separate facilities for men and women. Having people with all kinds of sexual preferences and behavior would also require some kind of separation to eliminate friction between soldiers.
When I was in the military, there were homosexuals among the troops. Not many but they were there but they behaved more or less like the rest of the guys so there was very little, if any, friction. Today, I don't know if that would be true since some homosexuals and others like to dramatize and to rub their preferences on other people's faces. I think it would be difficult sharing the barracks with people like that.
The most chocking thing I saw in the service were two marines eating each other up in a bar. It surprise me because they were very open about it when they were in their civies about town but it was not obvious when they were in uniform.
With TrumpWealthCare going down in flames His Orangness' snowflake ego needed a massage. He also needed some red meat to throw to the rabid right base . That, and all else said, trying to fathom the dark depths of his miind is a fools errand.
Mystic, Crooked Donny only consulted with General Bannon and General Pence on this one....sure smells like it.
Seriously though the real reason he's obsessed with the god damn wall is just to placate his foxmerized base. This is about gullible citizens willing to accept any validation tossed their way by a man who is going to kill their health insurance in order to give a massive tax break to an extremely wealthy few.
Trump knows he can't keep any campaign promises, he never intended to, so he uses crap like his fake/useless wall to delude his base.
If what I read is correct, the Generals that Drumph "Consulted" were caught totally off guard by this announcment, and none said they had been consulted. They learned about it at the same time as the rest of us. Perhaps Drumph consulted the Generals "In his Dreams". Perhaps he thought we wouldn't notice due to "LIE FATIGUE"!
I read somewhere that his golfing escapades, to Mar-a-Laga alone, cost the taxpayers more than having transgender in the military cost.
Most likely, the more he points his fingers, blames others, and discriminates is directly proportional to how unhappy his is with himself, his success or lack thereof, and his surroundings.
I can only hope that this is not his angry old man "get off my lawn moment" before he goes berserk.
Just curious! this was another set of tweets, and I'm wondering when do policies get changed via tweets, or does it take more action by the agencies, that plan for any policy changes?
I would say the real reason is: That there is not a more rotten, lying, hypocritical, immoral, treasonous, backstabbing, misogynist, bigoted, corrupt piece of garbage than Donald Jackoff Trump that has ever stunk up the White House. But that's just my opinion.
Legend you mean in post #31. In post #32 I was pointing out that the bleep bleppeity bleep bleep actually wrote ...Medicare for all is so great. Reading closer it is being asked If Medicare for all is so great then... goes on to criticize.
Some people try to derail progress and sabotage. Medicare for All could have been implemented in the 1960's. After almost six decades of healthcare moaning and complaining nonsense they still have no idea what they are doing.
The piece in Politco is persuasive, but it might simple be that Trump wants to pacify a base up in arms over Trump's treatment of Jeff Sessions, or it may be the usual: Trump just wants attention and being outrageous is one way to obtain it. The biggest news here is not news at all. Trump belief in his own greatness allows thim to sacrifice any individual or princle to that greatness. The man suffers from a recognized mental ilness found in the DSM. Narcissistic perosnality disorder.
America is fat, lazy, and getting old; that's why Clinton lost, and the opposite as it seems.
I was under the impression that this 2016 election was the first really unconstitutional election filled with everything the Corrupt Corporation Republicans could muster! Looks like I was completely in the dark on how bad they could get. I see the next election getting worse.
And it only took 40 years for about half of the people to wake up and see they are thieves. They worship, and do the evil of the rich. They suppress voters. The Democrats aren't angles either, they suck up to the corporations too - to a lesser extent (to wich they will owe them favors). But they still kind of care about the voters. So you vote for the lesser evil. (The green party will not win because it still has no strength.) Can't wait for the next 40 years for the rest of the people to wake up and see they've been ripped off. Oh, wait, I'll be already dead.
Merry Christmas Ou812
"Then that goddamn FAKE media had to splash pictures everywhere of that black sonofabitch, has-been president thanking his supporters for defeating Republicans and Trumpcare. FU! I'm the president now! And my crowd size is bigger! More than 140 characters? FU2! And all those little boy scout bastards! Reince Priebus, Sen. Grassley, and Gen. Dunford Jr. too! Ef em all! Poor sick people, my ass! Democrats and Hillary voters! Banning fags should put me at the center of attention again." @tRump
-- Leaked tweet storm
("Not sent; battery died; thank god" -- R. Priebus).
Diane, I am sure that Donald stays awake a night worrying about your 401K. "You're so vain." Actually, it's a surprise that anyone in the Whitie House gets any sleep with the stench that is everpresent in the oval office these days.
I am sure he will have a fan club after he is shown the door, after all even Charles Manson has one. Maybe you could put your best Republican smile on and try out for chapter head dragon of your local Trump oval bat cave. Mind your step, there will be a lot of guano in there as well.
Have a blessed afternoon.
I have no problem with property rights of which, capitalism is one expression. What is obscene, it seems to me, is that by incremental democratic process over the past 40 some years "We the People" have for one, allowed a few to gain absolute control over the communications megaphone. Now in control of the medium these few, shaping the message and collective thought to their super minority ends.
Responding to their anti-regulatory, anti-tax message, the message of the #billionaireclass expressed through their republican minions "We" have permitted restraint against irresponsible corporate behavior as well as the tax obligation of real and for the moment corporate persons to be reduced to almost negligible or one might even say negligent propotions.
The upshot being that while we live seemingly free, free to dress as we please, to associate with whom we please, to speak our minds, to travel; when viewed through an economic frame I ask, who is free that must labor sun up to sun down for compensation that bears no reflection to fair share of the wealth of our individual and collective labors, the volume of wealth we have produced? The answer is no one.
When viewed through this economic frame I ask further, how is our present reality any different from that of the worker of 250 years ago, the pre-revolutionary worker? It isn't; only the labels have changed. The masses labor to the benefit of a few.
For the first 150 years or so following the American Revolution, little changed. Then came the final insult, the crash of 29. Finally, Americans expressed the truly revolutionary promise of our revolution that in throwing off the shackles of monarchy "We the People" unlike the past wherein the only response to tyranny was violence, "We", the masses were now able to assure each could access or build a path to accessing fair share of the wealth of our labor; the vehicle, democratic process. By democratic process, we could insure that the apex alpha class of our society paid tax in proportion to their wealth, income and profits.
That my friends is the truly revolutionary outcome of our revolution, the masses for the first time in history could tax the property owner, thereby maintain the greatest portion of wealth in circulation and accessible. This reality is obscured in the question polled here and is moot when and if the the "People" exercise their democratic authority "...to promote the general Welfare".
#Taxthebillionaireclass
The democrats just missed their opportunity. The US Senate voted on a "single payer:" amendment Thursday night. Not one democrat voted for the amendment. That's right, NOT ONE. Could someone please explain.
K2
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/congress-healthcare-single-payer-debate/535143/
With special note to #2
Thanks to you malcontent leftie socialists, since the election of president Trump, my stock in P&G the makers of Pepto-bismol is up about 9%.
Now I need to research the charts of public conpanies that make dental implants because I am sure as this continues most of you will have no teeth left to chew your kale and sunflower dinner salads.
Thank you once again for making my morning a bit brighter and fatten my 401k at the same time.
Interesting. I though that the cost of the medical treatments to control hormones and to get plastic surgery needed to change sex would have been higher than you mention here. What's more, it's surprising that the military spends so much in Viagra.
There's an additional cost that you don't mention. There is the cost of separation in the barracks. Right now they have separate facilities for men and women. Having people with all kinds of sexual preferences and behavior would also require some kind of separation to eliminate friction between soldiers.
When I was in the military, there were homosexuals among the troops. Not many but they were there but they behaved more or less like the rest of the guys so there was very little, if any, friction. Today, I don't know if that would be true since some homosexuals and others like to dramatize and to rub their preferences on other people's faces. I think it would be difficult sharing the barracks with people like that.
The most chocking thing I saw in the service were two marines eating each other up in a bar. It surprise me because they were very open about it when they were in their civies about town but it was not obvious when they were in uniform.
With TrumpWealthCare going down in flames His Orangness' snowflake ego needed a massage. He also needed some red meat to throw to the rabid right base . That, and all else said, trying to fathom the dark depths of his miind is a fools errand.
July 2017
Health Care Research Paper Delivered to Congress
by The Sanders Institute and National Nurses United
https://www.sandersinstitute.com/blog/health-care-research-paper-delivered-to-congress
The Wall? Now there might be a rallying cry come 2020...'Vote for me and I'll tear down that wall'...
Mystic, Crooked Donny only consulted with General Bannon and General Pence on this one....sure smells like it.
Seriously though the real reason he's obsessed with the god damn wall is just to placate his foxmerized base. This is about gullible citizens willing to accept any validation tossed their way by a man who is going to kill their health insurance in order to give a massive tax break to an extremely wealthy few.
Trump knows he can't keep any campaign promises, he never intended to, so he uses crap like his fake/useless wall to delude his base.
I do not hold out for any justice from the 6 to 3 corrupt republican supreme court.
The biggest reason is to provide a smoke screen to prevent any media coverage of the questioning of Steve Brannon about Russian gate.
The rest is just smoke and mirrors.
If what I read is correct, the Generals that Drumph "Consulted" were caught totally off guard by this announcment, and none said they had been consulted. They learned about it at the same time as the rest of us. Perhaps Drumph consulted the Generals "In his Dreams". Perhaps he thought we wouldn't notice due to "LIE FATIGUE"!
I read somewhere that his golfing escapades, to Mar-a-Laga alone, cost the taxpayers more than having transgender in the military cost.
Most likely, the more he points his fingers, blames others, and discriminates is directly proportional to how unhappy his is with himself, his success or lack thereof, and his surroundings.
I can only hope that this is not his angry old man "get off my lawn moment" before he goes berserk.
Just curious! this was another set of tweets, and I'm wondering when do policies get changed via tweets, or does it take more action by the agencies, that plan for any policy changes?
Just another attempt to create more CHAOS--to distract from that "little tRUMP/Putin thing"!
Just another attempt to create more CHAOS--to distract from that "little tRUMP/Putin thing"!
I would say the real reason is: That there is not a more rotten, lying, hypocritical, immoral, treasonous, backstabbing, misogynist, bigoted, corrupt piece of garbage than Donald Jackoff Trump that has ever stunk up the White House. But that's just my opinion.
Legend you mean in post #31. In post #32 I was pointing out that the bleep bleppeity bleep bleep actually wrote ...Medicare for all is so great. Reading closer it is being asked If Medicare for all is so great then... goes on to criticize.
Some people try to derail progress and sabotage. Medicare for All could have been implemented in the 1960's. After almost six decades of healthcare moaning and complaining nonsense they still have no idea what they are doing.
If anyone read Jimmi Carters book about aparthied of the Palestinians,
A two state solution is the only way.
The West Bank is a prison!
Medical supplies and basic living essentials are rationed by Israel.
They are NOT a true democracy like our past with the Indians and African American camps.
Disgraceful.
The piece in Politco is persuasive, but it might simple be that Trump wants to pacify a base up in arms over Trump's treatment of Jeff Sessions, or it may be the usual: Trump just wants attention and being outrageous is one way to obtain it. The biggest news here is not news at all. Trump belief in his own greatness allows thim to sacrifice any individual or princle to that greatness. The man suffers from a recognized mental ilness found in the DSM. Narcissistic perosnality disorder.