Thank you for your interest and kind words Loretta. As the founder of the group, D.O.G., Democrats Own Guns, here in Minnesota, I can assure you I could have brought heavier artillery than a squirt gun. I decided to come armed with what I think most intimidates the extreme right...the truth. Civil discourse can be threatened , or thwarted by any number of tactics as demonstrated by the right wing these past several weeks. By shining a light on them we can hopefully send the cockroaches scurrying. Persistence will eventually win out against charlatans like Joe McCarthy or Michele Bachmann. I'll keep her in my sights...metaphorically speaking. We all should. She is a very dangerous threat to all of us.
Aug 21, 2009 Mark Levin interviewed someone from the Pacific Research Institute trying to state numbers of uninsured as lower by blaming some of them for own problems- the ignorant of existing public programs for insurance and drug co.-run 'patient assistance' programs to help people pay for needed drugs. Michael Tanner on Aug 27 Thom Hartmann was part of a push-back against doing anything. I went to a book signing at the Cato Institute about 9 years ago by Larry Elder for his book "10 things you can't say in America" and he blamed uninsured for not 'helping themselves' too. One of the 'things you can't say in America' was that there was no health care crisis. I bought the book to prove conservative stupidity and lies on this issue. I didn't ask to sign it.
DDay, darn it! What an awesome way to question Ms. Bachmann: throwing her voting record back at her. We should all do this when we go to town hall meetings since many people don't actually know how our elected leaders vote. Too bad. You should have had your "don't cut in front of me weapon with you, (A squirt gun).
Here's an article discussing the reality you described so well of what's going on in Louisiana, versus what the mayor would like the world to believe. Your post is better than the article, but I thought you would like to see the news reports that are attempting to tell part of the truth, .
Why is it that it's so difficult for bureaucracies to get aid money into the hands of those that most deserve and need it?
Dateline: 8-27-09 Minnesota Sixth Congressional District, Michele Bachmann Town Hall on Health Care.
Congresswoman Michele Bachmann held a town hall on health care before a overflow crowd at a local (Socialistic) Junior High School in Lake Elmo, MN. The location and time of the event seemed designed to challenge the attendance of all but the idle rich. The location was at the far end of a extremely long large congressional district, but, near her home. It began at 2:45 pm and went until 4:15pm. Working people be damned. This was one of the only times the congresswoman has exposed herself to questions from her constituents. It became immediately clear that the primary tactic of the right was to filibuster. Bachmann began with inane comments about football and Bret Favre, members of the audience were soon yelling out their wish to discuss the issue of health care. The MC of the event asked the audience to await his signal to form lines behind one of the two microphones if they had a question. I was seated in an aisle seat less than 10 feet from one microphone. Before any word was given, several supporters of the congresswoman rushed down to the microphones and took up the first six places in line. The seemingly stern MC, local legislator Bob Detmer, (R), MN.) smiled and then gave the word that the rest of us could line up now. The deck was stacked to his seeming satisfaction.
These favored first questioners all seemed to be reading from the same playbook. They each gave long winding biographies about themselves going on for up to five minutes before ending with comment like that they felt their liberty was threatened by the Obama plan to take over our finest health care system in the world. An edited video of the event can be seen at www.dustytrice.com.
Congresswoman Bachmann did field the few critics who made it to the microphone. She was unflappable and almost like a "Stepfordwife" in performance. There were at least two interesting new wrinkles revealed by the Palinator. First, she wants to eliminate the individual State's rights to regulate insurance companies doing business in their jurisdictions. She wants to open up all borders to all insurance companies, thus fostering competition. This is a sticky and tricky path for the notoriously Pro State's Rights Republicans. (Interstate vs. intrastate could pose some legal problems.)
The other wrinkle had to do with the uninsured. What does one do if you want to be seen as a morally superior individual but are confronted by a fact which seems to prove otherwise? You change the facts of course! We all have heard the figures of between 47 and 50 million men, women and children without medical insurance in America. Well you be glad to hear from Michele Bachmann that the number is "only" around 8 million. I predict that this will be trotted out more and more. I believe that Ms. Bachmann gets most if not all her talking points from the Heritage Foundation.
On a personal note to those who showed some interest, (Richard L. & Loretta), I was the next person at the microphone when they decided to end the Q&A. Drats...I had (I think) a pretty good question to pose too. I was going to recite her voting record on Health Care:
Jan. 2007 She voted NO to require negotiating drug prices for Medicare Part D
Oct. 2007 She voted NO on adding 2-4 million children to SCHIP
Jan. 2008 She voted NO on adding 6 million children to SCHIP
Mar. 2008 She voted NO to giving mental health parity with physical health
Given Ms. Bachmann's well known concern for the health and welfare of the UNBORN, I wondered why she has so little compassion for our children after birth?
Alas it wasn't to be. That's what happens when you follow the rules and behave politely. You get screwed by those who feel entitled to cut ahead of the line. What was really tragic to learn was that the first guy at the Microphone, a Mr.Trent Hubbard, was a fourth grade school teacher. Those poor students of his. I now have an idea what kind of example he gives and wonder what drivel he tries to infect their eager brains with.
Finally, an observation. There was some questionable behavior from people from either camp, but, one difference between the demeanors of those on the right from those on the left was the level of anger towards neighbors of opposing political stripes. Many, many, right wingers really seem to hate us on a personal level. More often than not this does not seem to be the attitude of liberals towards conservatives. Incredulity, puzzlement, surprise, or frustration seem to better describe the average lefty's reactions. They are mad and angry. My theory is that they probably had problems with nursing as infants and never got over it.
The thing that made him so special is that, by all rights, given his family name and wealth, and position, he could have easily been on the other side of so many issues that are important to everyday folks, like many others are, yet he choose, for whatever private reasons he might have had, to be on our side, to defend the poorest among us against the wealthiest, to defend the weakest among us against the strongest. In that sense he truly represented government of the people, by the people and most importantly FOR the people. Once again we are engaged in a great civil war testing whether we'll have that kind of nation, or one run by corporations, for corporations. We could have used his help. A lion is a good thing to have on your side in a fight.
Like you Thom, I'm 58. I find myself singing that song by Dion that unfortunately became famous in the 60"s
"Didn't you love the things that they stood for
Didn't they try to find some good in you and me
And we'll be free
Some day soon
It's gonna be a one day
Anybody here seen my old friend Teddy
Can you tell me where he's gone
I thought I saw him walking up over the hill
With Abraham, Martin (Bobby) and John"
In my first post on today’s blog I quoted the last part of a post by Mark that referred to me on Monday’s blog. Here’s the first part of that short post:
“Mark August 24th, 2009, 1:37 pm
Well, reiterating what I said in my last comment (and it’s actually a surprise to me that he thought I ‘d respond to his Friday comments, since I’ve never directly responded to anything he’s said before), history is simply what it is…”
Well, the Internet has a memory. Google can be a way of accessing it. Sometimes it takes skill and sometimes it takes luck. Bingo!
I was unable to respond to B Roll yesterday, so I will do so now..”
OK, so what. He forgot responding to one of my posts. I’m not saying he lied and I’m not making a big deal about him being mistaken; we all forget things. But this sets the record straight.
But what was behind that post I linked to does tell a lot about Mark’s perspective. Here’s the back story in a version shorter than I think I’m capable of. If you click on the link and read Mark’s post, this will help you understand the context.
Mark had criticized progressive talk radio for not dealing with the concerns of poor people and people of color. I wrote a comment to him saying that he shouldn’t judge all progressives by what he hears on “commercial” progressive radio and I pointed to several listener supported progressive media that not only deal with these issues, but on which poor people and people of color advocate for themselves. His response was to dismiss these sources at “a few brave souls out there on the fringes of the media” and went on to talk about racism.
I wasn’t telling him that racism doesn’t exist. I was pointing him in the direction of sources of progressive information, from white progressives and progressive people of color that deal with the topics he seemed to care about. His response was essentially to say that doesn’t count and white people are basically racist. That’s a theme he’s repeated on this blog several times. In his recent report on the progressive talkers event in Kent, Washington, he said that his opinion is that the difference between right-wingers and conservatives on issues of race is merely a matter of shading. He also said that he's involved in a war on two fronts, meaning he's at war with right-wingers and progressives.
Nick, good point! This is why sane dialogue is so important. Plus, I believe that Jimmy Carter also had a Democratic Congress and Senate. But, I must ask myself, "Do the powers that be really want health care for all Americans?"
I agree with Michael Tanner in that I believe for-profit healthcare should be allowed. I think it should be heavily regulated, but nontheless allowed. However, I do also believe that a public not-for-profit healthcare system should be available. People should be able to choose what kind of healthcare they want. if only government healthcare was the option, it would clamp down on individual rights by essentially creating a government run healthcare monopoly. people need options, and that is why i think that there should be private run and government run healthcare.
Thom
You cut David off and changed the subject when he was in the middle of telling your audience that in their final report, NIST admitted that WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration for over 2 seconds [105 feet]. This is the proof the NIST did NOT explain the collapse of WTC 7.
Shyam Sunder had stated in a briefing on 8-26-08 that: "a free fall time would be an object that has no structural components below it and that is not is not all unusual because there was structural resistance that was provided in this particular case." In other words, in the NIST scenario of progressive collapse there are always structural components providing resistance and preventing free fall acceleration from occurring. The NIST scenario and computer model do NOT fall at free fall acceleration.
For free fall acceleration to occur, all the structural supports on 7-8 floors were removed within 2 seconds. The only explanation is they were removed with explosives.
BTW: "OBL and 19 hijackers did it." is a conspiracy theory.
Any crime committed by two or more people is a conspiracy.
WTC 7 was a controlled demolition/progressive collapse are alternate building destruction theories.
it's sad to say but i was disappointed
with the national geographic response.
tom, rolled out the carpet or extended
the rope perfectly for all to hear their
angle on 911truth...it sounded weak.
we will soon see with their documentary.
we should all note that any truth
movement coming from a heritage
that can't recognize the radical differences
between Yahshua (jesus) and saul (paul)
is bound to make cultic mistakes in zeal
and remedy...
*we always notice,
when we break open the control of the questions,
we open up the freedom of the perfect answers,
which are always already present.
I haven’t been around to participate much this week, but I did hear most of the shows. Looking back through this week’s comments I ran across this little gem from one of Mark’s posts. It’s about my posts regarding the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.
“Mark August 24th, 2009, 1:37 pm
… history is simply what it is. B Roll would prefer to “sex it up.” I suspect that B Roll thinks what I recounted was “pedestrian” because he simply has no idea of it, and being presented with reality it’s a problem for him.”
So Mark claims “history is simply what it is.” I would think that Mark is sophisticated enough to know that there usually are more than one history of events, based on the perspectives of who’s telling it. In this case, it seems that Mark prefers the history as “written by the victors”. That’s not the same standard he has for the history of his people.
As for his “sex it up” comment, that’s typical of Mark’s writing. He seems to derive satisfaction by trying to demean people and ideas he disagrees with. Maybe his comments made him feel warm and fuzzy inside or even strong and victorious. But to use a term like “sex it up” (as vacuous it was) just to try to dismiss the serious views of someone who he disagrees with is not only disingenuous, it’s offensive to the life and death issues being discussed.
When he says that I have “no idea of it”, i.e., the history of the Israeli/Arab/Palestinian conflict, he’s speculating about MY history which he thinks makes me unfamiliar with the history of the region. But what does he know about me and my life? Rather than leave his knowledge of my history as a vacuum for Mark to play in, I’ll provides some facts.
I come from a secular Jewish family, so there’s an immediate connection to the situation. But wait, there’s more! In the late 1870s one of my ancestors, Naphtali Herz Imber, wrote a poem titled Tikvatenu (“Our Hope”). That poem was changed a little so it could be set to music and is now known as Hatikvah (The Hope). It’s Israeli national anthem. Guess Mark didn’t know that.
Both of my parents were Zionist from their youth and I heard the “history” Mark thinks is so shocking to me in my home and in Hebrew school. By the way, Marks retelling of his version of that history would earn him an Aleph+ (A+) in many Jewish Sunday schools. But then Jewish kids usually stop going to Hebrew school and Sunday school after their Bar and Bat Mitzvahs at age 13.
Another thing Mark probably doesn’t know is that my parents sent me to a Zionist summer camp, where I had a great time, for several years when I was around 9-12 years old. We heard about the history of Israel and of the oppression of the Jews. It seemed that the main purpose of the camp was to recruit young Jewish people to go to Israel and possibly even move to Israel. The camp was connected to a kibbutz in Israel.
The camp leader was always a retired Israeli military officer, though a different person each year. Every night, they would have all the (healthy) kids play some sort of game. The game changed from night to night, but there was a common thread. That thread was that each game involved elementary military techniques and tactics.
When we would go on hikes, we would sing the marching songs of pre-statehood military groups like the Palmach and Haganah which we were taught to idolize. We also sang Israeli folk songs and danced the Horah.
I don’t think Mark knew any of that. And it’s clear that his suspicion that my views are based on me being uninformed is just a bad guess. What he very well may have learned through the magic of Google over the last week or so is what I grew up with. He didn’t impress me by mentioning the Balfour Declaration and Ottoman Empire. And he doesn’t impress me by regurgitating the history of the area as told by supporters of Israeli policy.
But there clearly are things about the history of the Jewish people that he either doesn’t or doesn’t understand. In our homes and in out temples we were taught that we are a people committed to justice. That’s a large part of the reason that Jews have and do play such major rolls in so many progressive movements like civil rights, labor unions, civil liberties, women’s right, gay rights and more. I included women’s rights and gay rights as a reminder that Mark has shown himself to be consistently misogynistic and homophobic on the pages of this blog. (I can provide the proof.)
What Mark doesn’t understand is that for many people from Jewish families like me, the love of Israel and the history that we were taught as children came into conflict with what we’ve learned as adults about the injustices the Israeli state has perpetuated against the Palestinian people. And we were taught that above all else, we are a just people.
For the record, I understand the oppression that Jews suffered as a minority in Europe. That’s also part of my family history. I’ve decided to briefly tell how my maternal grandmother bled to death in the snow of a Polish winter after being shot by the Nazis while she was trying to run away. She had been hiding in a house, helped by Polish Catholic friends when a young man in the town found out and told the Nazis where they could find a Jewish woman. Her friends wrote to my family. They said that the man who turned in my grandmother was rewarded with two packs of cigarettes. Like several of my Jewish friends growing up, I never knew the special love of a grandparent. I never saw even one grandparent.
It’s sad that Mark, who is obviously an intelligent man, constantly resorts to insults rather than just stating his case. It’s a shame because he may be the best writer on this blog and some of his comments are both interesting and insightful. Bit maybe it’s like he said in his anti-progressive white post after the recent talker’s event in Kent, Washington; he’s in a war on two fronts; against the reactionary right and white progressives.
It probably escaped most or all of you that I used on of Marks stylistic touches in writing him. I didn’t address him directly. Just like he does, I wrote it about him not to him. But now I’m going to change that orientation.
In the words of my people, Mark, “Gornisht helfn.”
I didn’t plan on translating this since Mark is so good with Google, but since this is an idiomatic phrase I changed my mind.
Mark, you’re beyond help.
Next, I’ll be displaying the truly amazing things you can do with Google.
I listen to you daily, I have learned quite a bit from your show. However, I am disappointed in your segments with the 9/11 myth maker David Aaronovitchis. First of all your demeanor with him was one of respect, while your demeanor with David R Griffen was dismissive. Mr. Griffen's time was shorter, and you clearly wanted Mr. Aaronovitchis to give his prepared stock answers.
His experiment was bogus because he looked at only one small beam, to assume the entire building or even the entire floor was seeing the same heat loading is not supported by the photographic evidence or the firemen's audio accounts that have been released. THIS IS OBVIOUS. But you were silent.
Tom I sincerely hope you are not a tool of the Might Wurlitzer, called on to be friendly to govt. propaganda when the timing is right.
It seems that Louisiana’s governor, Bobby Jindal, has rejected over a $100 million in Medicaid and unemployment insurance funds from the federal stimulus program; but heck, he has his constituents’ best interests in mind, whoever they are. At least we know that they are not the 27,000 state residents who are eligible for post-Katrina rebuilding funds, but have yet to receive a single penny. Or those effected by the fact that his state is last in the nation in health care delivery.
Meanwhile, just in case you didn’t know, the fourth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina is right around the corner. Earlier this week, Jon Elliot reminded listeners of how the Republican version of “social engineering” was applied by the Bush administration in New Orleans and its coastal areas. HUD secretary Alphonso Jackson (another one of Bush’s Texas toadies who was forced to resign on corruption charges) seemed to take pleasure in boasting of how New Orleans was going to change from an mostly black to mostly white city. How to do this? Easy: Don’t cover the mostly black wards in New Orleans and parishes along the coast with federal disaster relief funds, and give the mostly white rural areas further afield that received lesser damage an inordinate amount of relief money. I recall news stories reporting how white rural folks were just handed thousands of dollars for no other reason than they merely asked for it, using it to “repair” their trailers and shacks with large screen plasma TVs.
Today, New Orleans’ Lower Ninth Ward is still in disaster mode, while other mostly black wards are barely in recovery mode. More than 65,000 residences in the city remain unoccupied, nearly a third of the total. Almost half of the rebuilding money promised to the city has not been paid, doubtless because most of it would have gone to the mostly black wards. Public housing projects being demolished are being replaced by units that will offer only a tiny fraction of the previous number for the “public housing eligible.” Renters have been completely ignored in favor of homeowners in receiving community block grants, while rents have increased more than 50 percent. Unemployment and the inaccessibility of much the population to health care (90 percent of Ninth Ward residents have no health insurance) continues the extraordinary need for emergency services and food relief while billions of dollars in relief funds remains unpaid.
Aaronovitchis seemed to be UNAWARE (which is unlikely -- so this is sarcasm) that the Neocons' Project for a New American Century (PNAC) clearly stated their need and desire of a "New Pearl Harbor".
That Bush conveniently used the 9/11 WTC detruction to gin up a FEAR campaign for his invasion of innocent nations like Afghanistan and Iraq does not look like two separate things from my perspective -- but rather a single seamless process!
David Aaronovitchis didn't have much to say--accept the repetition of the instantaneous story placed in the media as 9-ll was still occurring. Even before the second tower collapsed, photos of the hijackers were shown on the tube and at the time I said to my friend -- "How come they have all these photos of the hijackers at the newsroom already? If they knew these guys were dangerous, why weren't they tailing them?"
I think if this National Geographic special does NOT address the nano-fied, weaponized thermite issue (found in the WTC dust) -- then I will consider the National Geographic production an attempt to leap over this data and grab the maximum public audience in a clearly propagandized effort to DISMISS those who ask questions,
Great ideas for the overall advancement of modern life.
Unfortunately, the multi-national corporation behemoths are working toward opposite ends. They can (and do) legally flood American labor markets if any labor “shortage” exists that “drives up” their labor costs through a two pronged approach.
One is to offshore work to India and other low standard of living areas that Americans can not compete against. This is done by US corporations who do little or no business in India or other offshoring nations, so in effect they're flooding our labor market here.
The other method is to have high profile greed meisters like Bill Gates cry the blues to Congress that there is a shortage of highly skilled and highly educated workers in the US. Congress then allows literally hundreds of thousands of H1B visas each year to bring in these workers which floods the market as well.
As a note, in my 20+ years of working in hi-tech in the US I've yet to see any shortages, and even worse I have never seen a hi-tech job that a reasonably intelligent and motivated person couldn't learn.
Since posting that I have listened to the Wed podcast and was reminded of the great "liberal defence" quote from JFK that Teddy would quote as a proud liberal. It occurs to me that had another great Liberal, Walter Mondale, had the presence of mind to use that retort to Reagan in the 84 debate it might have changed a lot. Of course, if Ted had been able to articulate "why he wanted to be President" in the famous interview which he stumbed through things might have been different as well.
The long term issues with the use of fear as a motivator is folk develop a shell-shocked resistance to it so the abuser must escalate for diminishing results.
Thank you for your interest and kind words Loretta. As the founder of the group, D.O.G., Democrats Own Guns, here in Minnesota, I can assure you I could have brought heavier artillery than a squirt gun. I decided to come armed with what I think most intimidates the extreme right...the truth. Civil discourse can be threatened , or thwarted by any number of tactics as demonstrated by the right wing these past several weeks. By shining a light on them we can hopefully send the cockroaches scurrying. Persistence will eventually win out against charlatans like Joe McCarthy or Michele Bachmann. I'll keep her in my sights...metaphorically speaking. We all should. She is a very dangerous threat to all of us.
Aug 21, 2009 Mark Levin interviewed someone from the Pacific Research Institute trying to state numbers of uninsured as lower by blaming some of them for own problems- the ignorant of existing public programs for insurance and drug co.-run 'patient assistance' programs to help people pay for needed drugs. Michael Tanner on Aug 27 Thom Hartmann was part of a push-back against doing anything. I went to a book signing at the Cato Institute about 9 years ago by Larry Elder for his book "10 things you can't say in America" and he blamed uninsured for not 'helping themselves' too. One of the 'things you can't say in America' was that there was no health care crisis. I bought the book to prove conservative stupidity and lies on this issue. I didn't ask to sign it.
DDay, darn it! What an awesome way to question Ms. Bachmann: throwing her voting record back at her. We should all do this when we go to town hall meetings since many people don't actually know how our elected leaders vote. Too bad. You should have had your "don't cut in front of me weapon with you, (A squirt gun).
Great report. thank you. what a circus!
Mark:
Here's an article discussing the reality you described so well of what's going on in Louisiana, versus what the mayor would like the world to believe. Your post is better than the article, but I thought you would like to see the news reports that are attempting to tell part of the truth, .
Why is it that it's so difficult for bureaucracies to get aid money into the hands of those that most deserve and need it?
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hlc-jWVAIwXbNzBar4XgQo...
Dateline: 8-27-09 Minnesota Sixth Congressional District, Michele Bachmann Town Hall on Health Care.
Congresswoman Michele Bachmann held a town hall on health care before a overflow crowd at a local (Socialistic) Junior High School in Lake Elmo, MN. The location and time of the event seemed designed to challenge the attendance of all but the idle rich. The location was at the far end of a extremely long large congressional district, but, near her home. It began at 2:45 pm and went until 4:15pm. Working people be damned. This was one of the only times the congresswoman has exposed herself to questions from her constituents. It became immediately clear that the primary tactic of the right was to filibuster. Bachmann began with inane comments about football and Bret Favre, members of the audience were soon yelling out their wish to discuss the issue of health care. The MC of the event asked the audience to await his signal to form lines behind one of the two microphones if they had a question. I was seated in an aisle seat less than 10 feet from one microphone. Before any word was given, several supporters of the congresswoman rushed down to the microphones and took up the first six places in line. The seemingly stern MC, local legislator Bob Detmer, (R), MN.) smiled and then gave the word that the rest of us could line up now. The deck was stacked to his seeming satisfaction.
These favored first questioners all seemed to be reading from the same playbook. They each gave long winding biographies about themselves going on for up to five minutes before ending with comment like that they felt their liberty was threatened by the Obama plan to take over our finest health care system in the world. An edited video of the event can be seen at www.dustytrice.com.
Congresswoman Bachmann did field the few critics who made it to the microphone. She was unflappable and almost like a "Stepfordwife" in performance. There were at least two interesting new wrinkles revealed by the Palinator. First, she wants to eliminate the individual State's rights to regulate insurance companies doing business in their jurisdictions. She wants to open up all borders to all insurance companies, thus fostering competition. This is a sticky and tricky path for the notoriously Pro State's Rights Republicans. (Interstate vs. intrastate could pose some legal problems.)
The other wrinkle had to do with the uninsured. What does one do if you want to be seen as a morally superior individual but are confronted by a fact which seems to prove otherwise? You change the facts of course! We all have heard the figures of between 47 and 50 million men, women and children without medical insurance in America. Well you be glad to hear from Michele Bachmann that the number is "only" around 8 million. I predict that this will be trotted out more and more. I believe that Ms. Bachmann gets most if not all her talking points from the Heritage Foundation.
On a personal note to those who showed some interest, (Richard L. & Loretta), I was the next person at the microphone when they decided to end the Q&A. Drats...I had (I think) a pretty good question to pose too. I was going to recite her voting record on Health Care:
Jan. 2007 She voted NO to require negotiating drug prices for Medicare Part D
Oct. 2007 She voted NO on adding 2-4 million children to SCHIP
Jan. 2008 She voted NO on adding 6 million children to SCHIP
Mar. 2008 She voted NO to giving mental health parity with physical health
Given Ms. Bachmann's well known concern for the health and welfare of the UNBORN, I wondered why she has so little compassion for our children after birth?
Alas it wasn't to be. That's what happens when you follow the rules and behave politely. You get screwed by those who feel entitled to cut ahead of the line. What was really tragic to learn was that the first guy at the Microphone, a Mr.Trent Hubbard, was a fourth grade school teacher. Those poor students of his. I now have an idea what kind of example he gives and wonder what drivel he tries to infect their eager brains with.
Finally, an observation. There was some questionable behavior from people from either camp, but, one difference between the demeanors of those on the right from those on the left was the level of anger towards neighbors of opposing political stripes. Many, many, right wingers really seem to hate us on a personal level. More often than not this does not seem to be the attitude of liberals towards conservatives. Incredulity, puzzlement, surprise, or frustration seem to better describe the average lefty's reactions. They are mad and angry. My theory is that they probably had problems with nursing as infants and never got over it.
The thing that made him so special is that, by all rights, given his family name and wealth, and position, he could have easily been on the other side of so many issues that are important to everyday folks, like many others are, yet he choose, for whatever private reasons he might have had, to be on our side, to defend the poorest among us against the wealthiest, to defend the weakest among us against the strongest. In that sense he truly represented government of the people, by the people and most importantly FOR the people. Once again we are engaged in a great civil war testing whether we'll have that kind of nation, or one run by corporations, for corporations. We could have used his help. A lion is a good thing to have on your side in a fight.
Like you Thom, I'm 58. I find myself singing that song by Dion that unfortunately became famous in the 60"s
"Didn't you love the things that they stood for
Didn't they try to find some good in you and me
And we'll be free
Some day soon
It's gonna be a one day
Anybody here seen my old friend Teddy
Can you tell me where he's gone
I thought I saw him walking up over the hill
With Abraham, Martin (Bobby) and John"
For the record:
In my first post on today’s blog I quoted the last part of a post by Mark that referred to me on Monday’s blog. Here’s the first part of that short post:
“Mark August 24th, 2009, 1:37 pm
Well, reiterating what I said in my last comment (and it’s actually a surprise to me that he thought I ‘d respond to his Friday comments, since I’ve never directly responded to anything he’s said before), history is simply what it is…”
Well, the Internet has a memory. Google can be a way of accessing it. Sometimes it takes skill and sometimes it takes luck. Bingo!
http://www.thomhartmann.com/2009/06/01/fridaybroadcasting-live-from-the-...
“Mark June 4th, 2009, 4:02 pm
I was unable to respond to B Roll yesterday, so I will do so now..”
OK, so what. He forgot responding to one of my posts. I’m not saying he lied and I’m not making a big deal about him being mistaken; we all forget things. But this sets the record straight.
But what was behind that post I linked to does tell a lot about Mark’s perspective. Here’s the back story in a version shorter than I think I’m capable of. If you click on the link and read Mark’s post, this will help you understand the context.
Mark had criticized progressive talk radio for not dealing with the concerns of poor people and people of color. I wrote a comment to him saying that he shouldn’t judge all progressives by what he hears on “commercial” progressive radio and I pointed to several listener supported progressive media that not only deal with these issues, but on which poor people and people of color advocate for themselves. His response was to dismiss these sources at “a few brave souls out there on the fringes of the media” and went on to talk about racism.
I wasn’t telling him that racism doesn’t exist. I was pointing him in the direction of sources of progressive information, from white progressives and progressive people of color that deal with the topics he seemed to care about. His response was essentially to say that doesn’t count and white people are basically racist. That’s a theme he’s repeated on this blog several times. In his recent report on the progressive talkers event in Kent, Washington, he said that his opinion is that the difference between right-wingers and conservatives on issues of race is merely a matter of shading. He also said that he's involved in a war on two fronts, meaning he's at war with right-wingers and progressives.
Nick, good point! This is why sane dialogue is so important. Plus, I believe that Jimmy Carter also had a Democratic Congress and Senate. But, I must ask myself, "Do the powers that be really want health care for all Americans?"
Thom should be ashamed of himself for encouraging truthers
truther = birthers = nutjobs
I agree with Michael Tanner in that I believe for-profit healthcare should be allowed. I think it should be heavily regulated, but nontheless allowed. However, I do also believe that a public not-for-profit healthcare system should be available. People should be able to choose what kind of healthcare they want. if only government healthcare was the option, it would clamp down on individual rights by essentially creating a government run healthcare monopoly. people need options, and that is why i think that there should be private run and government run healthcare.
Thom
You cut David off and changed the subject when he was in the middle of telling your audience that in their final report, NIST admitted that WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration for over 2 seconds [105 feet]. This is the proof the NIST did NOT explain the collapse of WTC 7.
Shyam Sunder had stated in a briefing on 8-26-08 that: "a free fall time would be an object that has no structural components below it and that is not is not all unusual because there was structural resistance that was provided in this particular case." In other words, in the NIST scenario of progressive collapse there are always structural components providing resistance and preventing free fall acceleration from occurring. The NIST scenario and computer model do NOT fall at free fall acceleration.
For free fall acceleration to occur, all the structural supports on 7-8 floors were removed within 2 seconds. The only explanation is they were removed with explosives.
BTW: "OBL and 19 hijackers did it." is a conspiracy theory.
Any crime committed by two or more people is a conspiracy.
WTC 7 was a controlled demolition/progressive collapse are alternate building destruction theories.
aloha to everyone,
it's sad to say but i was disappointed
with the national geographic response.
tom, rolled out the carpet or extended
the rope perfectly for all to hear their
angle on 911truth...it sounded weak.
we will soon see with their documentary.
we should all note that any truth
movement coming from a heritage
that can't recognize the radical differences
between Yahshua (jesus) and saul (paul)
is bound to make cultic mistakes in zeal
and remedy...
*we always notice,
when we break open the control of the questions,
we open up the freedom of the perfect answers,
which are always already present.
I haven’t been around to participate much this week, but I did hear most of the shows. Looking back through this week’s comments I ran across this little gem from one of Mark’s posts. It’s about my posts regarding the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.
“Mark August 24th, 2009, 1:37 pm
… history is simply what it is. B Roll would prefer to “sex it up.” I suspect that B Roll thinks what I recounted was “pedestrian” because he simply has no idea of it, and being presented with reality it’s a problem for him.”
So Mark claims “history is simply what it is.” I would think that Mark is sophisticated enough to know that there usually are more than one history of events, based on the perspectives of who’s telling it. In this case, it seems that Mark prefers the history as “written by the victors”. That’s not the same standard he has for the history of his people.
As for his “sex it up” comment, that’s typical of Mark’s writing. He seems to derive satisfaction by trying to demean people and ideas he disagrees with. Maybe his comments made him feel warm and fuzzy inside or even strong and victorious. But to use a term like “sex it up” (as vacuous it was) just to try to dismiss the serious views of someone who he disagrees with is not only disingenuous, it’s offensive to the life and death issues being discussed.
When he says that I have “no idea of it”, i.e., the history of the Israeli/Arab/Palestinian conflict, he’s speculating about MY history which he thinks makes me unfamiliar with the history of the region. But what does he know about me and my life? Rather than leave his knowledge of my history as a vacuum for Mark to play in, I’ll provides some facts.
I come from a secular Jewish family, so there’s an immediate connection to the situation. But wait, there’s more! In the late 1870s one of my ancestors, Naphtali Herz Imber, wrote a poem titled Tikvatenu (“Our Hope”). That poem was changed a little so it could be set to music and is now known as Hatikvah (The Hope). It’s Israeli national anthem. Guess Mark didn’t know that.
Both of my parents were Zionist from their youth and I heard the “history” Mark thinks is so shocking to me in my home and in Hebrew school. By the way, Marks retelling of his version of that history would earn him an Aleph+ (A+) in many Jewish Sunday schools. But then Jewish kids usually stop going to Hebrew school and Sunday school after their Bar and Bat Mitzvahs at age 13.
Another thing Mark probably doesn’t know is that my parents sent me to a Zionist summer camp, where I had a great time, for several years when I was around 9-12 years old. We heard about the history of Israel and of the oppression of the Jews. It seemed that the main purpose of the camp was to recruit young Jewish people to go to Israel and possibly even move to Israel. The camp was connected to a kibbutz in Israel.
The camp leader was always a retired Israeli military officer, though a different person each year. Every night, they would have all the (healthy) kids play some sort of game. The game changed from night to night, but there was a common thread. That thread was that each game involved elementary military techniques and tactics.
When we would go on hikes, we would sing the marching songs of pre-statehood military groups like the Palmach and Haganah which we were taught to idolize. We also sang Israeli folk songs and danced the Horah.
I don’t think Mark knew any of that. And it’s clear that his suspicion that my views are based on me being uninformed is just a bad guess. What he very well may have learned through the magic of Google over the last week or so is what I grew up with. He didn’t impress me by mentioning the Balfour Declaration and Ottoman Empire. And he doesn’t impress me by regurgitating the history of the area as told by supporters of Israeli policy.
But there clearly are things about the history of the Jewish people that he either doesn’t or doesn’t understand. In our homes and in out temples we were taught that we are a people committed to justice. That’s a large part of the reason that Jews have and do play such major rolls in so many progressive movements like civil rights, labor unions, civil liberties, women’s right, gay rights and more. I included women’s rights and gay rights as a reminder that Mark has shown himself to be consistently misogynistic and homophobic on the pages of this blog. (I can provide the proof.)
What Mark doesn’t understand is that for many people from Jewish families like me, the love of Israel and the history that we were taught as children came into conflict with what we’ve learned as adults about the injustices the Israeli state has perpetuated against the Palestinian people. And we were taught that above all else, we are a just people.
For the record, I understand the oppression that Jews suffered as a minority in Europe. That’s also part of my family history. I’ve decided to briefly tell how my maternal grandmother bled to death in the snow of a Polish winter after being shot by the Nazis while she was trying to run away. She had been hiding in a house, helped by Polish Catholic friends when a young man in the town found out and told the Nazis where they could find a Jewish woman. Her friends wrote to my family. They said that the man who turned in my grandmother was rewarded with two packs of cigarettes. Like several of my Jewish friends growing up, I never knew the special love of a grandparent. I never saw even one grandparent.
It’s sad that Mark, who is obviously an intelligent man, constantly resorts to insults rather than just stating his case. It’s a shame because he may be the best writer on this blog and some of his comments are both interesting and insightful. Bit maybe it’s like he said in his anti-progressive white post after the recent talker’s event in Kent, Washington; he’s in a war on two fronts; against the reactionary right and white progressives.
It probably escaped most or all of you that I used on of Marks stylistic touches in writing him. I didn’t address him directly. Just like he does, I wrote it about him not to him. But now I’m going to change that orientation.
In the words of my people, Mark, “Gornisht helfn.”
I didn’t plan on translating this since Mark is so good with Google, but since this is an idiomatic phrase I changed my mind.
Mark, you’re beyond help.
Next, I’ll be displaying the truly amazing things you can do with Google.
Tom,
I listen to you daily, I have learned quite a bit from your show. However, I am disappointed in your segments with the 9/11 myth maker David Aaronovitchis. First of all your demeanor with him was one of respect, while your demeanor with David R Griffen was dismissive. Mr. Griffen's time was shorter, and you clearly wanted Mr. Aaronovitchis to give his prepared stock answers.
His experiment was bogus because he looked at only one small beam, to assume the entire building or even the entire floor was seeing the same heat loading is not supported by the photographic evidence or the firemen's audio accounts that have been released. THIS IS OBVIOUS. But you were silent.
Tom I sincerely hope you are not a tool of the Might Wurlitzer, called on to be friendly to govt. propaganda when the timing is right.
It seems that Louisiana’s governor, Bobby Jindal, has rejected over a $100 million in Medicaid and unemployment insurance funds from the federal stimulus program; but heck, he has his constituents’ best interests in mind, whoever they are. At least we know that they are not the 27,000 state residents who are eligible for post-Katrina rebuilding funds, but have yet to receive a single penny. Or those effected by the fact that his state is last in the nation in health care delivery.
Meanwhile, just in case you didn’t know, the fourth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina is right around the corner. Earlier this week, Jon Elliot reminded listeners of how the Republican version of “social engineering” was applied by the Bush administration in New Orleans and its coastal areas. HUD secretary Alphonso Jackson (another one of Bush’s Texas toadies who was forced to resign on corruption charges) seemed to take pleasure in boasting of how New Orleans was going to change from an mostly black to mostly white city. How to do this? Easy: Don’t cover the mostly black wards in New Orleans and parishes along the coast with federal disaster relief funds, and give the mostly white rural areas further afield that received lesser damage an inordinate amount of relief money. I recall news stories reporting how white rural folks were just handed thousands of dollars for no other reason than they merely asked for it, using it to “repair” their trailers and shacks with large screen plasma TVs.
Today, New Orleans’ Lower Ninth Ward is still in disaster mode, while other mostly black wards are barely in recovery mode. More than 65,000 residences in the city remain unoccupied, nearly a third of the total. Almost half of the rebuilding money promised to the city has not been paid, doubtless because most of it would have gone to the mostly black wards. Public housing projects being demolished are being replaced by units that will offer only a tiny fraction of the previous number for the “public housing eligible.” Renters have been completely ignored in favor of homeowners in receiving community block grants, while rents have increased more than 50 percent. Unemployment and the inaccessibility of much the population to health care (90 percent of Ninth Ward residents have no health insurance) continues the extraordinary need for emergency services and food relief while billions of dollars in relief funds remains unpaid.
Maybe WTC was "detonated" because Obama's "real" birth certificate was in a safe on the 27th floor?
Aaronovitchis seemed to be UNAWARE (which is unlikely -- so this is sarcasm) that the Neocons' Project for a New American Century (PNAC) clearly stated their need and desire of a "New Pearl Harbor".
That Bush conveniently used the 9/11 WTC detruction to gin up a FEAR campaign for his invasion of innocent nations like Afghanistan and Iraq does not look like two separate things from my perspective -- but rather a single seamless process!
David Aaronovitchis didn't have much to say--accept the repetition of the instantaneous story placed in the media as 9-ll was still occurring. Even before the second tower collapsed, photos of the hijackers were shown on the tube and at the time I said to my friend -- "How come they have all these photos of the hijackers at the newsroom already? If they knew these guys were dangerous, why weren't they tailing them?"
I think if this National Geographic special does NOT address the nano-fied, weaponized thermite issue (found in the WTC dust) -- then I will consider the National Geographic production an attempt to leap over this data and grab the maximum public audience in a clearly propagandized effort to DISMISS those who ask questions,
David Ray Griffin is a wackadoodle truther.
Truthers are left wing nuts, just like birthers are right wing nuts.
Why is Thom giving this clown air time?
Great ideas for the overall advancement of modern life.
Unfortunately, the multi-national corporation behemoths are working toward opposite ends. They can (and do) legally flood American labor markets if any labor “shortage” exists that “drives up” their labor costs through a two pronged approach.
One is to offshore work to India and other low standard of living areas that Americans can not compete against. This is done by US corporations who do little or no business in India or other offshoring nations, so in effect they're flooding our labor market here.
The other method is to have high profile greed meisters like Bill Gates cry the blues to Congress that there is a shortage of highly skilled and highly educated workers in the US. Congress then allows literally hundreds of thousands of H1B visas each year to bring in these workers which floods the market as well.
As a note, in my 20+ years of working in hi-tech in the US I've yet to see any shortages, and even worse I have never seen a hi-tech job that a reasonably intelligent and motivated person couldn't learn.
Matt's idea is great!!!
Since posting that I have listened to the Wed podcast and was reminded of the great "liberal defence" quote from JFK that Teddy would quote as a proud liberal. It occurs to me that had another great Liberal, Walter Mondale, had the presence of mind to use that retort to Reagan in the 84 debate it might have changed a lot. Of course, if Ted had been able to articulate "why he wanted to be President" in the famous interview which he stumbed through things might have been different as well.
The long term issues with the use of fear as a motivator is folk develop a shell-shocked resistance to it so the abuser must escalate for diminishing results.