DDay,

Last week, when Thom discussed the 350 "threshhold," he made an oblique reference to someone on the blog talkiing about how a part of the country may have better weather due to climate change and sounded irritated about it.

DDay,

I've been thinking about something about which I want to ask you. Pawlenty is busy positioning himself for the Rep. prez. primary in '12. Pawlenty's governorship seems to have been engineered by Texas money --- the same faction that is making crap out of everything else in our country:

http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2006/12/19/swiftboathatch/

Could a good investigative journalist uncover the connections (and discredit Pawlenty?) 'Just wondering what you think about all this. I am considering sending info. to Rachel Maddow to look at. (She has followed up on several previous links I've sent her.) Do you know anything new on this stuff?

It’s ok to disagree and have a discussion! That’s how we figure out the best ways to fix it! By sharing knowledge and experience! That was the Populist movement – understand the problem and issues to find solutions.

Do you know the different options?

Government run health system: All hospitals are government owned and all doctors are government employees. (This is not part of any of the bills under consideration or being discussed).

Single Payer: All health care is paid for by government but hospitals and doctors may remain private.

Public Option: Government funds one of many insurance plans competing in the marketplace. Kind of like a brand x company buying health care for its’ employees. These costs are separate from Medicare and other programs. The costs are covered by those using this program.

Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Administration – all government run health plans.

Currently, in the private insurance sector, the investors must be paid even if that means denying care to patient/policy holder.

Medicare Part B – was added to cover prescriptions but denied the government status of a big buyer getting reduced rates for high volume. WE pay top dollar for all prescriptions covered but there is still a ‘donut hole’ that requires additional insurance coverage. President Obama has bargained to get $10 Billion cut from this cost – 2% reduction. Big Pharma is so powerful that they can threaten a president or country!

Hyde Amendment: No government funds can be used to pay for an abortion.
This will NOT change as part of the Health care reform.

Death Panel? Two parts to this. First, you will have the option to talk to YOUR doctor about end of life decisions. Do not resuscitate, Living Will, etc. so you can understand all of the issues and can make decisions before any crises occurs and this meeting will be paid for/covered . The ‘panel’ will ensure that once your decisions have been made that the Doctor and hospital have access to your information and will follow YOUR wishes. This is the Living Will, Advance Life issue that was encouraged after Terrie Schiavo ended up on the front page. She did not have her decisions in writing. Her parents disagreed with her husband and Jeb Bush asked George W. Bush to put through legislation so they could intervene.

Torte reform: Has been implemented by some states but costs are negligible. This only accounts for about 1-2% of costs incurred by doctors and hospitals. It is a red herring – a distraction to turn your eyes away from the real issues. However, Pres. Obama has said they will add this to the legislation.

State lines (portability): This is a way to get states to compete and sell out the interests of regular people in order to gain some business. They give up taxes (income) and often provide special protection for the corporation without oversight (so you can’t sue if disagree with service). In addition, laws vary from state to state and insurance companies can reside in states that provide the least protection to consumers, or none, to increase their profits. In many cases there is no penalty for non-compliance – e.i. if they don’t cover your health issue, you can go to court and after many years the insurance company may be required to pay for the bills that they were supposed to pay when you signed with them. (Fleecing option!)

TRILLIONS of dollars in Profit are at stake!
MILLIONS of dollars in propaganda!
For lobbyists, politicians and ads!
WE will PAY no matter who wins! We must get what WE need!

Any updates or corrections to this?????

He's all over the map., grasping & missing.
Thank you Thom.

the famous Hitler quote about the campuses acting up ---- used in the 60's!

I received a note yesterday, with the Sunday edition of my local newspaper, to the effect that they will be "outsourcing" delivery, and that this will be the last paper delivered by my local carrier.

My first reaction - "What - some kid in INDIA is gonna be delivering my paper now??!!"

My local paper is called the Times Herald Record, published in Middletown, NY (could the name more clearly indicate that it had already undergone a merger process more than once?). About 2 years ago, thy implemented an on-line bill paying system, the result of which was that we almost never saw our local carrier any more - the paper was in our mailbox when we woke up, and since the carrier did not have to come by to collect from us, we no longer saw him (or her, as the case may have been).

My second raection - "Boy, what a dummy this carrier is - if he'd told us about this earlier, we coulda given him one last tip!" That's when it occurred to me that, because the carrier no longer came to collect directly from us, we were only tipping him/her at Christmastime, anyway. I'm pretty sure the same is the case with most of my neighbors.

At some point last year, it was acquired by Murdoch's NewsCorp, local columnists gradually vanished, and most content came off the wire services. I've been considering dropping it for a while, now. This may be the last straw. With the economy shedding jobs at a frightening rate, this organization is phasing out the paper route - one of the best and most traditional income sources for young Americans.

Quark,

I'm not sure why you think Thom may be pissed at you about your concerns over Climate Change, or Climate Disruption, or whatever the term of art is this week. I do know that the Heritage Foundation or some similar group preferred calling it "Global Warming" because it sounded more attractive and less menacing than Global Climate Change. It may interest you, Quark, (and Thom), that eight out of nine Republican candidates running to replace Tim Pawlenty as Governor in Minnesota are arguing over who is the biggest climate change denier. In fact one Moron who happens to be my State Senator and who is running for Guv. actually claims we are actually cooling! I kid you not. He also claims to be the biggest expert on all matters scientific at our State Capitol and in the legislature. God help us. Oh yah you betcha, he even is also a self proclaimed man of the cloth. He ministers to motocross people. I have never been able to confirm any real degrees or accreditation for either his theological or scientific claims. You can't make these things up.

Here is the interesting kicker. I hope this particular State Senator becomes the endorsed Republican candidate for Governor. That's why I haven't mentioned his name yet. I don't want to impede his accent. I want to see him climb to the top of the heap. The reason being; the higher you climb the harder the splat when you fall. In the interest of full disclosure I ran his opponent's campaign last election cycle four years ago. Just two weeks before election day I was able to get two campaign finance and ethics convictions against this idiot. Unfortunately, I couldn't get much coverage from our local newspapers. (Most were/are owned by the family of a former Republican Governor here) Most voters here never heard about the convictions. My candidate, a straight arrow, 25yr.military veteran (ret.) and now school teacher lost by less than 900 VOTES. Some might say, well ho hum an ethical or campaign violation is pretty boring. Who would be interested? Well, no the untold stories were fairly interesting and even funny. The Senator in question was represented by the same law firm that represented Norm Coleman in the recount fight. His convictions were for several infractions, but they stemmed from stealing public campaign finance funds and buying MODEL AIRPLANES! for himself! More than $1500.00 worth! Less than 6 months later I filed charges against him again and got a conviction for the more serious offense of KNOWINGLY filing false campaign reports. Again the papers here were not interested. They had another case that week which was more sensational in that it featured a conservative State Rep. in a domestic abuse case who had thrown a bible at his wife. (Rep. Mark Olson, R.)
I am praying that the senator in question who is now running for Governor will climb high. If he is able to reach a high enough place, perhaps the press will then look at his record. Here is my plea and prayer: If you live in Minnesota, send $5 to Sen. Mike Jungbauer, R. He is the self proclaimed "leading climate change denier" in the race. He deserves our support. If he gets the exposure he seeks, I can promise a just ending this time. It may even help our climate problems.

Note: To verify or research my assertions one can check out those local Republican owned newspapers at: HometownSource.com or ABC Newspapers. You can go to google and search Michael Jungbauer and ethics.
That is only if you have no life or on the off chance you are interested in this little story.

Charles Darwin film 'too controversial for religious America'
A British film about Charles Darwin has failed to find a US distributor because his theory of evolution is too controversial for American audiences, according to its producer.

It has been sold in almost every territory around the world, from Australia to Scandinavia. However, US distributors have resolutely passed on a film which will prove hugely divisive in a country where, according to a Gallup poll conducted in February, only 39 per cent of Americans believe in the theory of evolution.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6173399/Charl...

I was out with my signs for Health Reform! Along with a number of other people on Saturday. Why wasn't that in the news???
The signs - and flip side ----
Stop Hate - We are all in this together - Americans! (made in shape of stop sign)
Medicare for ALL! TRILLIONS in profits = MILLIONS in propaganda!
We did pass out leaflets, for those interested, that showed based info that was provided by Congresswoman Carolyn Kilpatricks office -- Health Information Reform!

Thom,

I think you're pissed with me for my recent comments on this blog about global climate disruption --- "atmosphere destruction" is even better. (I stopped calling it global warming a long time ago.) I (lamely, admittedly) joked --- really, gallows humor --- that the upper midwest may at least get a warmer than usual winter. (Now this prediction has changed, too.)

You said it yourself --- we're all screwed. I really don't have a lot of hope. The planet will go on without us, as it has during past extinction cycles. Western man in general is too stupid or (more likely) too corrupt to listen to those who try to warn us to change our ways...

I periodically reference Jared Diamond and his writings on this blog. Here's a video which brings out the ideas in his recent book Collapse:

"Jared Diamond - How Societies Fail-And Sometimes Succeed - Long Now Foundation"

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4271982381147720351#

Leading Financial Modeling Expert: Adam Smith Was Wrong About the "Invisible Hand"

One of the leaders of the new science of financial modeling - Rama Cont - points out that Adam Smith was wrong about the "Invisible Hand".

Specifically, investors in financial markets rationally pursuing individual profit can produce outcomes that are bad for almost everyone.

As an article http://www.city-journal.org/2009/19_3_financial-markets.html in City Journal notes:

Simple forecasts can also be mistaken if they fail to account for the actions of market participants themselves: investor strategies can influence prices, which in turn influence future strategies in a feedback loop that can cause considerable instability. Cont recalls the severe stock-market crash of October 1987, which seemed to strike out of the blue, since nothing significant was happening in the real economy. Subsequent research, though, blamed the crash in part on a new investment strategy, “portfolio insurance,” which a large number of fund managers had simultaneously adopted. Based on the famous Black-Scholes options-pricing model, this strategy recommended that fund managers reduce their risks by automatically selling shares whenever their values fell. But the approach didn’t take into account what would happen if many investors followed it simultaneously: a massive sell-off that could send the market plummeting. The 1987 crash was thus not provoked by events in the real economy but by a supposedly smart risk-management strategy—and the current downturn, of course, also derives at least partly from a global craze for a seemingly foolproof financial innovation...

Investors in financial markets rationally pursuing individual profit, then, can produce outcomes that are globally negative. Doesn’t that contradict classical economic theory? “Both theory and empirical facts do tend to show that, on the financial markets, the Invisible Hand does not always lead to welfare-improving general outcomes,” Cont replies.

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/

It was amusing listening to the defensive measures some of these right-wing radio gasbags deployed in the immediate aftermath of Obama’s health care speech, gasping for breath and grasping for straws. “The Judge,” faced with callers who praised Obama (one gave his speech an “A+”), was unable or unwilling to refute the charge that the Republicans hadn’t seemed overly concerned about paying for Bush’s tax cuts for the rich or the Iraq war. Rather, he desperately enjoined listeners to ignore such mendacities of the past and face the fearful wrath of Obama, who will make you pay for health care reform. When another caller who praised Obama’s speech mentioned Joe Wilson’s outburst, the hapless Judge could only defend Wilson by pointing out that Obama was the one who said “lie” first; unfortunately, on the sound clip he immediately played to prove this, we hear Obama saying it was “false” that illegal immigrants would be covered, then Wilson shouting “lie,” which didn’t quite have the effect that was intended.

On another station, Michael Weiner—err, Savage—blathered about nonsensically about communism and Nazism, then lost his train of thought completely. Suddenly he remembered something of vital importance to the security of the nation : Why haven’t we heard from Michelle? Where is Michelle? Fortunately, or just coincidentally, he had handy a list of the 29 members her White House staff, who Savage referred to as her “servants.” She quit her day job as a lawyer just so she could have servants at the Big House. Funny how you never heard liberals have the bad manners to talk about Laura Bush and her “servants” at the White House, let alone the ones she deploys back at the ranch.

It hasn’t taken long for the racist right to regain its footing, however. One must note that it was when Obama said it was “false” that in his plan illegal immigrants would be covered, that Wilson was moved to shout out “You lie!” Most of the commentary in regard to Wilson’s outburst has focused on the rudeness of it. However, it should be pointed out that Wilson is clearly agitated about “the Mexicans” along with the rest of his constituency, which by the way has a history of not liking black people, either. In South Carolina (as in most of the South) anti-Latino hate doesn’t “discriminate” in terms of legality, as the SPLCenter pointed out in a lengthy report on the “civil rights crisis” that is accompanying the current phase of “dark-skinned” paranoia and xenophobia.

The fact is that the Republicans are reticent about immigration reform because it is too useful a tool to use to rile up their nativist, xenophobic and racist base. It’s like the death panels; the idea that the government wants to mandate death is absurd, yet there are people who hate Obama (because he has dark skin) so much that they can’t help but believe it no matter how often you tell them it isn’t true. The same with the belief that illegal immigrants will be allowed to participate in a public option; you can tell the bigots over and over again that it isn’t part of the plan, and that simply because you hate “Mexicans” doesn’t make it true, either. It just doesn’t seem to get through. Illegal immigrants are being used as a “race card” to cynically exploit white fears of health care equality, and wreck reform.

On Friday, Sen. Kent Conrad was pestered with questions by two reporters (probably working for Fox News) concerning illegal immigrant access to health care. He had to denied several times that there was any such intention, and had to dodge questions that were clearly aimed at tripping him up, like surely illegals could participate in a co-op if they paid for insurance. To his credit, Conrad took pains to point out that just because a person does not have a social security number, it should not be assumed that he or she is an illegal alien, and that those legal residents without Social Security numbers should still be allowed to benefit from the reform program.

Unreasoning bigotry is nothing new in this country. Back in the mid-19th Century, a political party calling itself the “American Party” formed in order to promote the rights of “real” Americans, which of course didn’t include Native Americans. Because this movement was actually born from secret societies whose members revealed nothing about themselves (like the KKK), the party became known as the Know-Nothing. Nativism, xenophobia and racism (back then, even Europeans were divided into “races,” a concept that would be used to promote immigration quotas beginning in the 1920s, and by the Nazis) was their calling card.

There were, of course, a few persons who found the “American” Party and its ideology repulsive: “I am not a Know-Nothing,” opined Abraham Lincoln. “That is certain. How could I be? How can anyone who abhors the oppression of negroes, be in favor of degrading classes of white people? Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we begin by declaring that ‘all men are created equal.’ We now practically read it ‘all men are created equal, except negroes.’ When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty-to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”

Today, it Latinos who are American citizens whose “real” Americanism is questioned, denied or ignored; "real" Americans tend to regard you the same way regardless of your legal status. The immigration “debate” is what it has always been: a smokescreen to allow an “acceptable” vent for latent racist paranoid convulsions. If we didn’t have a Latino “problem,” the venting would merely be transferred to another group. After the outbreak of World War II, the Japanese residing in this country were unjustly interned; but just as shameful—and never acknowledged—was the fact that FDR allowed the forced expulsion of an estimated 300,000 U.S. citizens of Mexican descent from the country. They were not able to retrieve what was stolen from them, nor were they later given reparations.

It is interesting to note that until the 1920s when immigration laws were first put into force to slow the influx of “inferior races” (like Mediterranean and Eastern Europeans), there were no barriers to immigration save that of the price of ship fare—that is to say, by today’s laws, all whites who entered this land were “illegal,” at least insofar that nobody asked the natives' permission. And another note: There were as many as a 100 million indigenous people southward of the Rio Grande, from tens of thousands of years before the first white man showed his pallid form (most Europeans, by the way, migrated to "Europe" from central Asia). As in Africa, national boundaries were the white man’s arbitrary creation. One might fairly observe that it is one thing to cross a river, but it is quite another to cross an ocean and claim the land is yours. In the U.S., Canada, South Africa and Australia, whites assumed the right to steal the land from native peoples who existed in them for thousands of years; they then (and now) had the audacity to complain when their victims act on what they learned from the white man’s “just” ways.