Wyoming has less than 600000 population. They get 3 electoral votes (1 Congressman and 2 Senators) or 200000 persons per electoral vote. California has 40000000 and has 55 electoral votes. It is 727272 persons per electoral vote. This has to change! This is not Democracy! About as fair as China.
The history of the Nebraska unicameral offers some lessons. The change took place in 1934 during the Depression. A chief proponent, Republican Senator George W. Norris, criticized the bi-cameral system as inconsistent with ideals of American equality. He is quoted as saying,
"The constitutions of our various states are built upon the idea that there is but one class. If this be true, there is no sense or reason in having the same thing done twice, especially if it is to be done by two bodies of men elected in the same way and having the same jurisdiction."
There was also a clean government backdrop. The lore of the bi-cameral in Nebraska is that each chamber was controlled by one of the two railroads. Norris would have known this well as he came from a city very influenced by one of the railroads, including hosting the railroad's orchestra. The circumstances also hint at concerns over corruption with the help of political parties. The move to a non-partisan unicameral was not an accident.
djgilbert, I agree about Nebraska. What might work in the US is a non-partisian system of apportioning Congressional districts in each state, with (the Nebraska and Maine systems) electoral votes going to whichever candidate gets a pluraity of each district, plus the 2 senate electroral votes going to whoever gets a pluairty in the whole state. That would not abolish the electoral college but would make it more responsive to popular votes. Not likely to happen though....
Democracy works in some countries, not others, not now anyway. Tribalism, historical feuds, no tradition of sharing power...all those work against it in many states. India found a way to make this more-or-less work, elsewhere it quickly devolved into dictatorships or wars. Anyway, western Europe found ways to integrate monarchies into parliamentary systems and in Britain the royals do bring in some money with tourism and the like. The deeply bureaucratic state that is Britain would survive without a "living flag", but traditions do run deep there. It will be interesting to see if after Elizabeth dies some countries leave the Commonwealth, and if Scotland uses this as a time to pull out and rejoin the EU. (With the centennial of the establishment of Northern Ireland coming up that place could get interesting too.)
Monarchies represent a continuation of a feudal era but are with us in much more than the British Royal Family. Several Western European countries have monarchies and layers of royalty such as dukes/duchesses, counts/countesses, etc. Interestingly enough, many of the former Soviet states have more completely shed royalty than the Western European democracies.
We should not forget that the workplace in all of these countries is by and large a feudal state. The operative term is CXX, starting with CEOs. Perhaps we should focus on democracy in the workplace rather than being distracted by interviews of royals.
In terms of the U.S. system, the modern scope and scale of government is far beyond the neo-monarchy of an elected president set up in the U.S. Constitution. A healthy dose of federalism is perhaps the only hope of saving the American experiment from fascism.
There are successful models such as the Swiss Federal Council, with an annually revolving presidency and members serving as liaisons to the major federal administrative departments. Using a regional approach of electing a non-partisan "Federal Council of the United States" by region for single terms may be worth considering. Members could be elected in a primary, top-two non-partisan election with a balanced proportional model.
In such a model, the Senate may not be needed. One State, Nebraska, managed to abandon the bi-cameral legislature so it is possible. Nebraska legislators are elected in a primary, top-two final election system to a non-partisan legislature. The legislature functions without political parties in committee assignments and seniority.
Time to shut down the royal palace permanently. Why do the British people suffer under this ignominious oligarchical parade of fools? The people are in poverty, yet Piers Morgan could care less? The Queen needs to either dress down or become a contestant on RuPaul's drag race.....so out of touch with humanity, she channels Sean Inshannity!
Doorknobs still believes the Trump big lie. The first election Trump was in was 2015 Primary in Iowa and he lost to Ted Cruz. Lied and called it a rigged election. 2016 constantly repeated rigged election. 2020 same thing. How many times do you buy into a lie? That the election was rigged. If anything it was won despite the Republican rigging.
There is no "if" -- Republicans are guilty of voter suppression. The extensive factual history of red-state antics over several decades clearly demonstrates the absolute certainty of that.
Biden was elected despite the suppression efforts for at least three big reasons that come to mind: Because of the pandemic, more Democrats than Republicans voted by mail (A lot of the original suppression tactics targeted the act of voting in person at polling stations.); Democrats conducted massive get-out-the-vote campaigns to make sure that people were properly registered (Purging the names of likely Democratic voters off registration lists by the millions without good cause is perhaps Republican Secretaries of State's most egregious tactic.); Americans, in general, voted in overwhelming numbers in concert with Democrats because of their utter disgust with Trump and his all-out fascist inclinations.
The margin of victory would no doubt have been a helluva lot more than seven million had there been no suppression by Republicans, as you falsely imply.
Why do you think that freaked-out red-state legislators are now introducing an avalanche of new voter suppression laws (many restricting mail-in voting) using Trump's "Big Lie" as their phony excuse? And why are they so afraid of more people voting, making it harder to vote instead of easier?
Legend and cuz are absolutely correct that the U.S. should have "Compulsory Voting" like in Australia. We also need to get rid of the cumbersome, insane, and totally unnecessary Electoral College system, which is what Trump was abusing to overthrow our democracy. These and other critical reforms can happen when the demographics inevitably change the face of America, as alis volat points out.
Whether tyrannical leaders cause mass targeted deaths, within their respective populations, by perpetrating ethnic cleansing, or genocide, and do so by acts of commission or omission; the outcomes fall into the same category i.e. "crimes against humanity." Widespread death does not have to be meted out publicly or savagely, to make it any less criminal. Malice, hatred, power-lust and a reckless disregard for human life, are the common denominators.
The actions of the Trump Administration, should be investigated to determine whether they amount to "genocide" or "crimes against humanity." The world waits. I make a prima facie case supporting the foregoing asssertion in my oped news article.
Whether tyrannical leaders cause mass targeted deaths, within their respective populations, by perpetrating ethnic cleansing, or genocide, and do so by acts of commission or omission; the outcomes fall into the same category i.e. "crimes against humanity." Widespread death does not have to be meted out publicly or savagely, to make it any less criminal. Malice, hatred, power-lust and a reckless disregard for human life, are the common denominators.
The actions of the Trump Administration, should be investigated to determine whether they amount to "genocide" or "crimes against humanity." The world waits. I make a prima facie case supporting the foregoing asssertion in my oped news article.
I am saddened by the utter lack of integrity these "gritty" CONS possess!
The answer is "fight fire with fire" Slam dunk these punks and put them where all TRAITORS belong, in the 'Hoosegow' for life! These subhumans are not Patriots, but rather [if I may utilize a tad of poetic license] Ratriots!
Wyoming has less than 600000 population. They get 3 electoral votes (1 Congressman and 2 Senators) or 200000 persons per electoral vote. California has 40000000 and has 55 electoral votes. It is 727272 persons per electoral vote. This has to change! This is not Democracy! About as fair as China.
Cheap Minocycline 50 mg Cheap Minocycline 50mg Generic Minocycline online Cheap Minocycline 50 mg Minocycline 50 mg online
Cheap Minocycline 50 mg Cheap Minocycline 50mg Generic Minocycline online Cheap Minocycline 50 mg Minocycline 50 mg online
Of course they're Republicans. The judge is, so it's a safe bet the rest are too since it appears they're all part of the same gang.
"Four people, including justice of the peace, arrested on 150 counts of voter fraud."
From today's news:
Texas attorney general gives local authorities until 6 p.m. to suspend mask mandates.
DrRichard,
The history of the Nebraska unicameral offers some lessons. The change took place in 1934 during the Depression. A chief proponent, Republican Senator George W. Norris, criticized the bi-cameral system as inconsistent with ideals of American equality. He is quoted as saying,
"The constitutions of our various states are built upon the idea that there is but one class. If this be true, there is no sense or reason in having the same thing done twice, especially if it is to be done by two bodies of men elected in the same way and having the same jurisdiction."
There was also a clean government backdrop. The lore of the bi-cameral in Nebraska is that each chamber was controlled by one of the two railroads. Norris would have known this well as he came from a city very influenced by one of the railroads, including hosting the railroad's orchestra. The circumstances also hint at concerns over corruption with the help of political parties. The move to a non-partisan unicameral was not an accident.
Yep, want to hope so
djgilbert, I agree about Nebraska. What might work in the US is a non-partisian system of apportioning Congressional districts in each state, with (the Nebraska and Maine systems) electoral votes going to whichever candidate gets a pluraity of each district, plus the 2 senate electroral votes going to whoever gets a pluairty in the whole state. That would not abolish the electoral college but would make it more responsive to popular votes. Not likely to happen though....
Democracy works in some countries, not others, not now anyway. Tribalism, historical feuds, no tradition of sharing power...all those work against it in many states. India found a way to make this more-or-less work, elsewhere it quickly devolved into dictatorships or wars. Anyway, western Europe found ways to integrate monarchies into parliamentary systems and in Britain the royals do bring in some money with tourism and the like. The deeply bureaucratic state that is Britain would survive without a "living flag", but traditions do run deep there. It will be interesting to see if after Elizabeth dies some countries leave the Commonwealth, and if Scotland uses this as a time to pull out and rejoin the EU. (With the centennial of the establishment of Northern Ireland coming up that place could get interesting too.)
Monarchies represent a continuation of a feudal era but are with us in much more than the British Royal Family. Several Western European countries have monarchies and layers of royalty such as dukes/duchesses, counts/countesses, etc. Interestingly enough, many of the former Soviet states have more completely shed royalty than the Western European democracies.
We should not forget that the workplace in all of these countries is by and large a feudal state. The operative term is CXX, starting with CEOs. Perhaps we should focus on democracy in the workplace rather than being distracted by interviews of royals.
In terms of the U.S. system, the modern scope and scale of government is far beyond the neo-monarchy of an elected president set up in the U.S. Constitution. A healthy dose of federalism is perhaps the only hope of saving the American experiment from fascism.
There are successful models such as the Swiss Federal Council, with an annually revolving presidency and members serving as liaisons to the major federal administrative departments. Using a regional approach of electing a non-partisan "Federal Council of the United States" by region for single terms may be worth considering. Members could be elected in a primary, top-two non-partisan election with a balanced proportional model.
In such a model, the Senate may not be needed. One State, Nebraska, managed to abandon the bi-cameral legislature so it is possible. Nebraska legislators are elected in a primary, top-two final election system to a non-partisan legislature. The legislature functions without political parties in committee assignments and seniority.
Time to shut down the royal palace permanently. Why do the British people suffer under this ignominious oligarchical parade of fools? The people are in poverty, yet Piers Morgan could care less? The Queen needs to either dress down or become a contestant on RuPaul's drag race.....so out of touch with humanity, she channels Sean Inshannity!
Apparently, nuance is not your strong point.
Our society has separated into two groups,
One group says leave me alone and I will leave you alone,
and the other group that says "obey me or else".
Time to learn a lesson from your dog:
No matter what life brings you, kick some grass over that shit and move on.
"No matter how bad your life is, it's still not as bad as a person who sits around worrying about the lack of gender of a plastic potato."
ftfy
Exactly.
Voting Laws Roundup: February 2021
Hah! Mister Potato Head Tucker Carlson must be having a really bad life then as he sits around Fux "News" pontificating on the subject.
Doorknobs still believes the Trump big lie. The first election Trump was in was 2015 Primary in Iowa and he lost to Ted Cruz. Lied and called it a rigged election. 2016 constantly repeated rigged election. 2020 same thing. How many times do you buy into a lie? That the election was rigged. If anything it was won despite the Republican rigging.
There is no "if" -- Republicans are guilty of voter suppression. The extensive factual history of red-state antics over several decades clearly demonstrates the absolute certainty of that.
Biden was elected despite the suppression efforts for at least three big reasons that come to mind: Because of the pandemic, more Democrats than Republicans voted by mail (A lot of the original suppression tactics targeted the act of voting in person at polling stations.); Democrats conducted massive get-out-the-vote campaigns to make sure that people were properly registered (Purging the names of likely Democratic voters off registration lists by the millions without good cause is perhaps Republican Secretaries of State's most egregious tactic.); Americans, in general, voted in overwhelming numbers in concert with Democrats because of their utter disgust with Trump and his all-out fascist inclinations.
The margin of victory would no doubt have been a helluva lot more than seven million had there been no suppression by Republicans, as you falsely imply.
Why do you think that freaked-out red-state legislators are now introducing an avalanche of new voter suppression laws (many restricting mail-in voting) using Trump's "Big Lie" as their phony excuse? And why are they so afraid of more people voting, making it harder to vote instead of easier?
Legend and cuz are absolutely correct that the U.S. should have "Compulsory Voting" like in Australia. We also need to get rid of the cumbersome, insane, and totally unnecessary Electoral College system, which is what Trump was abusing to overthrow our democracy. These and other critical reforms can happen when the demographics inevitably change the face of America, as alis volat points out.
No matter how bad your life is, it's still not as bad as a person who sits around worrying about the gender of a plastic potato.
If Republicans were guilty of voters suppression, Joe Biden would have never been elected President.
Whether tyrannical leaders cause mass targeted deaths, within their respective populations, by perpetrating ethnic cleansing, or genocide, and do so by acts of commission or omission; the outcomes fall into the same category i.e. "crimes against humanity." Widespread death does not have to be meted out publicly or savagely, to make it any less criminal. Malice, hatred, power-lust and a reckless disregard for human life, are the common denominators.
The actions of the Trump Administration, should be investigated to determine whether they amount to "genocide" or "crimes against humanity." The world waits. I make a prima facie case supporting the foregoing asssertion in my oped news article.
https://www.opednews.com/articles/Rivers-of-blue-blood-by-Irene-Fowler-B...
Whether tyrannical leaders cause mass targeted deaths, within their respective populations, by perpetrating ethnic cleansing, or genocide, and do so by acts of commission or omission; the outcomes fall into the same category i.e. "crimes against humanity." Widespread death does not have to be meted out publicly or savagely, to make it any less criminal. Malice, hatred, power-lust and a reckless disregard for human life, are the common denominators.
The actions of the Trump Administration, should be investigated to determine whether they amount to "genocide" or "crimes against humanity." The world waits. I make a prima facie case supporting the foregoing asssertion in my oped news article.
https://www.opednews.com/articles/Rivers-of-blue-blood-by-Irene-Fowler-B...
I am saddened by the utter lack of integrity these "gritty" CONS possess!
The answer is "fight fire with fire" Slam dunk these punks and put them where all TRAITORS belong, in the 'Hoosegow' for life! These subhumans are not Patriots, but rather [if I may utilize a tad of poetic license] Ratriots!
I agree that the US should follow the Australian voting system to the letter. No substitutions, carve-outs, or concessions.